Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GrumpyGus who wrote (5817)	1/4/2016 9:27:14 PM
From: RuddyMongoose	2 Recommendations Recommended By GMPInvestor Mister D Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5988

Message #5817 from GrumpyGus at 1/4/2016 5:29:13 PM The contract is for 75,000 tons over one year. That is pretty close to 300 tons/day, which is the number the chief used. Obviously the purchasing company sees no problem with that volume, so why should you? Do you have any idea about the physical size and weight of 500 tons of marble being processed EVERY day? Do you understand anything about the marble market and the effect that volume of marble would have? Chief has simply assumed that the market would easily absorb his estimated volume of processed marble. I say it won't happen. Once you know the answers to those question you will understand why Chief's processing and revenue estimates are unrealistic. His numbers sound fantastic and very exciting to naive investors but experienced investors know that Chief is full of pumper hot air. Grumpy, IF we knew the name of that purchasing company, we could do some DD and assess whether or not that company has the wherewith-all to carryout Chief's estimated processing volume of marble. Until we know more about the company, none of us can assess the situation properly from an investment point of view. Maybe you can explain why the company's name is being concealed from retail investors?