SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (912579)1/6/2016 11:08:35 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577883
 
America has been duped on climate change


By Robert Brulle January 6 at 12:31 PM

Each week, In Theory takes on a big idea in the news and explores it from a range of perspectives. This week we’re talking about the ethics of global warming. Need a primer? Catch up here.
Robert Brulle is a professor of sociology and environmental science at Drexel University in Philadelphia. He is co-editor of “ Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives.

Future generations will look back on our tepid response to global climate disruption and wonder why we did not act sooner and more aggressively. Climate change will adversely impact present and future generations, as well as all species on Earth. Our moral obligation to protect life requires us to act.

Yet even after the recently completed United Nations climate conference, we are still on track for dangerous levels of climate change. Why haven’t we acted sooner or more aggressively? One answer can be found in the split over the veracity of climate science.

Recent scholarship documents the coordinated efforts of conservative foundations and fossil fuel corporations to promote this uncertainty. Amplified by conservative media, this campaign of disinformation and omission has significantly altered the nature of the public debate and led to political polarization around the issue, making meaningful legislative action nearly impossible.

These findings are supported by recent investigative news reports, which show that since the 1970s, top executives and scientists in the fossil fuel industry have been well aware of the evidence that their products amplified climate-warming emissions. They conducted their own extensive research on the topic and participated in ongoing scientific discussions. The American Petroleum Institute, an industry trade group, even circulated the results to its members. By 1978, a senior executive at ExxonMobil proposed creating a worldwide “CO2 in the Atmosphere” research and development program to determine an appropriate response.

Unfortunately, that path wasn’t taken. Instead, in 1989, a group of fossil fuel corporations, utilities and automobile manufacturers banded together to form the Global Climate Coalition. This group worked to ensure that the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions, was not adopted by the United States. In public statements, the Global Climate Coalition continued to deny that global warming was occurring and emphasized the uncertainty of climate science.

The spreading of misinformation continued. In 1998, API, Exxon, Chevron, Southern Co. and various conservative think tanks initiated a public relations campaign, the goal of which was to ensure that the “recognition of uncertainties (of climate science) becomes part of the ‘conventional wisdom.'”
While that coalition disbanded in 2001, ExxonMobil reportedly continued to quietly funnel climate misinformation through “skeptic” think tanks, such as the Heartland Institute, until 2006, when its funding was exposed. The company — the nation’s largest and wealthiest — continues to work with the American Legislative Exchange Council, a so-called public-private partnership of corporations and conservative legislators, to block climate change policies.

For years, ExxonMobil had been a participant in public efforts to sow doubt about climate change. Yet at at the same time, the corporation was at the leading edge of climate science and its executives were well informed regarding the scientific consensus on climate change. This allegedly deceitful conduct has generated public outrage and recently led New York’s attorney general to initiate an investigation into whether ExxonMobil has misled the public and investors about the risks of climate change.

While important, these legal proceedings cannot fully address the larger moral issues of corporate social and political responsibility. Just as Congress investigated the efforts of the tobacco industry to dupe the public into believing its products were harmless, we need a full and open inquiry into the conduct of ExxonMobil and the other institutions whose misinformation campaigns about science have delayed our efforts to address climate change.

The central concern here is the moral integrity of the public sphere. The Declaration of Independence says the legitimacy of government is based on the consent of the governed. But when vested interests with outsize economic and cultural power distort the public debate by introducing falsehoods, the integrity of our deliberations is compromised.

Such seems the case today when we consider the fossil fuel industry’s role in distorting discourse on the urgent topic of climate change. If vested economic interests and public relations firms can systematically alter the national debate in favor of their own interests and against those of society as a whole, then the notion of democracy and civic morality is undermined. Congress can and should act to investigate this issue fully. Only then can we restore trust and legitimacy to American governance and fulfill our moral duty to aggressively address climate change.

washingtonpost.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (912579)1/8/2016 1:04:51 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 1577883
 
More on "CO2 is plant food"...

Heat Waves And Drought Are Already Having A Devastating Impact On Important Crops

by Natasha Geiling Jan 7, 2016 3:55 pm

CREDIT: AP Photo/Nati Harnik

A dry field of corn during the 2012 drought in the United States.

For all the wrong reasons, the summer of 2012 was a historic one for the American Midwest. Plagued by the worst drought the region had seen in decades, as well as weeks of high temperatures, one of the country’s most productive agricultural regions faced massive shortages in its annual corn crop, driving corn prices to a record high.

A new study, published Wednesday in Nature, argues that the American Midwest isn’t the only place to see staple crops like corn suffer in the face of extreme weather events. The paper, written by a team of geographers from the University of British Columbia, analyzed the effects that extreme temperatures, floods, and droughts have had on the last five decades of crop harvests. What they found was that both droughts and heat waves had a marked impact on a country’s crop production, cutting into cereal crops like wheat, rice, and maize by 10 percent and 9 percent respectively. Floods and cold spells, the study found, had no impact on crop production.

We don’t think about it much, but rice, wheat and maize alone provide more than 50 percent of global caloriesPerhaps surprisingly, the study also found that the damages to crops were greater in developed countries than developing ones, running counter to the idea that developed countries can afford technological fixes to buffer crops against things like drought and extreme heat. Cereals in North America, Europe, and Australia, for instance, suffered 19.9 percent decreases in production during droughts, compared to a 12.1 percent decrease in Asia and a 9.2 percent decrease in Africa.

The study’s authors hazarded a few reasons for this distinction, starting with the fact that in developing countries, farmers often tend to rely on smaller, more diverse farm plots, compared to the larger monocropping systems common in developed countries. On a farm with only one main crop — maize, for instance — drought has a uniform impact, whereas on farms with a more diverse menu of crops, drought might impact some crops while leaving others unaffected. Small-holder farmers in developing countries also tend to already employ risk-minimizing strategies on their farms, a practice that makes them more resilient to potential shifts in weather and climate.

Global warming is expected to increase the likelihood of heat waves around the world, and could also contribute to more droughts in some regions. Those changes will occur as the world’s population continues to grow — likely reaching 9 billion by 2050 and placing more stress on farmers to provide food under increasingly variable conditions.

“We don’t think about it much, but rice, wheat, and maize alone provide more than 50 percent of global calories,” Navin Ramankutty, an author of the study, told the New York Times. “When these grain baskets are hit, it results in food price shocks, which leads to increasing hunger.”

Farmers have already seen an uptick in the damage to crops caused by extreme weather events in recent decades — according to the study, the effect of drought on crop production has worsened since 1985, something the authors speculate could be due to a combination of more intense droughts, increased vulnerability to droughts, and changes in drought and loss reporting. Overall, between 1964 to 2007, the study estimates that a total of three billion tons of cereal crops were lost due to drought and heat waves.

When these grain baskets are hit, it results in food price shocks, which leads to increasing hungerIn the United States, cereal crops occupy a huge amount of farm acreage, with corn and wheat registering as the first and third most common field crop in the country, respectively. The majority of the country’s corn crop is grown throughout the Midwest, which, according to the 2014 National Climate Assessment, is expected to experience more heatwaves, droughts, and floods in the future due to climate change. The United States’ wheat crop is primarily grown in the country’s northern states — North Dakota, South Dakota, and Montana — as well as throughout the Great Plains. Like the Midwest, the United States’ Great Plains are expected to become dramatically hotter as the climate changes.

thinkprogress.org