Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Dino's Bar & Grill -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goose94 who wrote (15443)	1/11/2016 6:55:43 PM
From: Goose94	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 203358

Junk Rhymes with Subprime On December 16th 2008, in what Ben Bernanke averred took a tremendous amount of "moral courage", the Federal Reserve officially arrived at its Zero Interest Rate Policy. ZIRP was a huge win for borrowers because it drove down the carrying cost of debt to historic lows. Unfortunately, savers didn't fare as well. Those frantic savers were forced to reach for yield far out along the risk curve. And an obliging Wall Street issued over $1 trillion in new junk bonds at the lowest spreads to Treasuries in the 35 year history of the junk debt market. To put this in perspective, the entire high yield market had previously hit its frothy peak of $1.2 trillion in the bubbly days of 2007, in October of last year junk bond debt alone hit $1.7 trillion, adding to the total $2.6 trillion high yield debt market. Through these newly issued Junk-bonds investors generously financed America's shale boom that is now going bust. Junk debt also provided the lowest-grade borrowers cushy terms such as covenant-lite offerings and PIK (Payment-in-Kind toggle), which allows issuers to pay some of the interest due by borrowing new debt. And also financed lavish dividend payments for those debt holders. But now the Fed's mission is to prove to Wall St. and Main St. that nearly eight years' worth of ZIRP has succeeded in saving the economy. Therefore, it has finally embarked on its path to interest rate normalization. However, on the way down this road to normalization the junk debt market has started to discount increased borrowing costs and a U.S. recession, which is the bane for high-yield debt. The carnage has just begun. Lucidus Capital Partners-an investment manager specializing in corporate credit--recently announced it was liquidating its entire portfolio and returning $900 million to clients next month. Third Avenue rattled markets when it announced December 9th that it's liquidating a $788.5 million corporate debt mutual fund and delaying distribution of investor cash to avoid even bigger losses. And Stone Lion Capital Partners has also halted cash redemptions for its investors. But as usual the Wall Street cheerleaders quickly provided a myriad of excuses for these individual failures and eagerly offered reasons why this isn't systemic. They claim Third Avenue focused on ultra-high risk illiquid assets that didn't belong on a mutual fund platform. And that Lucidus had one large investor who wanted his money back. Or, that outside of energy these junk bond funds are rock solid. However, within the Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund 78% of the top ten holdings were not energy related at all. This is eerily reminiscent of similar assurances given at the onset of the sub-prime fund failures back in 2008. As the Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Fund and the Bear Stearns High-Grade Structured Credit Enhanced Leveraged Fund brought down the legendary investment bank that bears its name, most pundits were confident that these particular funds represented isolated cases. Those same Wall Street apologist were busy pontificating that the failure of Bear Stearns was due to a mismanagement issue and not part of a larger problem in the mortgage market; and certainly had nothing to do with a systemic problem in financial institutions or the global economy. Likewise, this time around the issue is not limited to just a small subsection of high-yield junk. Remember those CLO's (collateralized loan obligations) that almost brought down the entire economy in 2008? They are back and are now being issued at a record pace. Yield hungry institutional mangers and retail investors have been lured into these debt securities that are collateralized by loan pools consisting of highly illiquid bank loans. To make matters worse, leveraged bank loans outstanding, which have been the engine of the recent financial engineering of M&A and stock buybacks, amounts to nearly $900 billion, up 80% from the post crisis bottom. Investors in search of a higher yield coveted the mortgages of unqualified homeowners leading up to the Great Recession. Today, they have turned their pursuits to low-credit corporate debt and the leveraged loans of distressed borrowers. In 2007 the entire mortgage market was worth $10.7 trillion dollars; $4.6 trillion of which was composed of sub-prime and Alt-A loans. Currently, the high-yield debt market is more than 55% of that amount today. However, just like the carnage in the Sub-prime mortgage market was not at all contained, the entire credit market spectrum from Junk to Sovereign debt is now in a bubble. And because prices have been artificially manipulated by the Fed for so long, all bond yields will eventually spike either due to inflation and/or insolvency. For seven years our economy, and especially our stock market, have grown off the back of asset bubbles and artificially suppressed interest rates. As these misallocations of capital are revealed Janet Yellen and company will realize our fragile economy cannot withstand the pressures of interest rate normalization. Therefore, she will be compelled to take back her quarter point rate hike in an act that I'm sure Wall Street will categorize as "mortified courage." Perhaps the most important take away from the Great Recession was that the blowup in sub-prime eventually exposed the bubble in real estate and the banking system as a whole. And as the market begins to see the forest behind the high-yield trees, it will realize that after seven years of ZIRP and QE the true bubble exists in the entire universe of fixed income. Michael Pento

To: Goose94 who wrote (15443)	1/14/2016 8:59:22 AM
From: Goose94	Respond to of 203358

BRILLIANT BULLSHIT!!! On Tuesday evening I watched president Obama's state of the union address. It was brilliant. Obama rang all the bells, dotted all the i's, and attacked all the ghosts. At times, he even made sense. All in all, it was a brilliant effort, possibly his best speech ever, even though his speech was essentially bullshit. In case you missed that speech, whether by accident or out of disgust, here is a Transcript Text of President Obama's 2016 State of the Union address. Video Ad Libs Obama deviated from his prepared transcript greatly. Here is a video for interested parties. Belief in Change In his address, Obama said "I believe in change because I believe in you". That's ironic because his first campaign slogan was "Change you can believe in". People believed in change but what change did Obama deliver? Despite promises, we are still in Afghanistan. Despite promises, we did not close Guantanamo Bay. The Mideast is a bigger mess than ever. US unemployment is indeed half of what it was when Obama took office. But who gets the credit for that? The answer is retiring baby boomers dropping out of the labor force by mad. Any US president would have achieved the same result by doing nothing. Obama gets to brag because he is lucky enough to be in office at the time. Doing Things Obama did do things. Obamacare was a disaster. But he bragged about it. Obama's treaty with Iran is his single most positive accomplishment in eight years, but that's in dispute by many on the left and right. Affordable Education From the left, Obama received massive applause for affordable education. Affordable "anything" would get applause from socialists. Yet, "affordable education" will drive up costs every bit as much as "affordable housing". Without a doubt, history shows that any time government sets out to make something "affordable", the opposite happens. Dare I ask: Were Bush's "Ownership Society" and "No Child Left Behind" programs all that different from Obama's proposals? Pure Political Bullshit 75% of Obama's speech was purely political bullshit. Proving the sorry state of divisive politics, Obama received little applause, even on topics where he was right. Campaign finance reform was one such topic. Congress is clearly bought and sold by special interest groups. On the left, unions rule. On the right, bankers rule. In general, neither party really wants reform. If they did, we would have had reform by now. Hypocrisy in Action Had a Republican given the exact same speech (stripping out global warming and other obvious nonsense), Republicans would have applauded every step of the way. Obama's mention of "No Child Left Behind", a ridiculous program of the Bush administration, was nothing short of brilliant. Republicans cheered Bush's program at that time. Curiously, there was dead silence from the Republican side of the aisle when Obama praised it. Had a Republican bragged about taking out Osama Bin Laden, Republicans would have cheered like mad and Democrats would have been silent. We saw the opposite. Brilliance Explained Obama's SOTU speech was pure brilliance. With just a few minor tweaks, either party could have given the same speech, with accolades from their party. That's "brilliant bullshit" at its finest. Mike Shedlock