SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : SOLOMON-PAGE SYMBOL -SOLP- -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Driscoll who wrote (227)12/28/1997 3:22:00 PM
From: Thomas Kirwin  Respond to of 295
 
Earnings Release

Bill,

I left a message for Mr. Eric Davis the CFO of SOLP on Friday 12/26 regarding the status of earnings. I will advize once word is received.

As a point of reference 1996 year end numbers (09/30/96) were released on December 18th. IMHO there is no reason for concern. I believe that the SEC year-end filing must be made by December 31. Possible reasons for the slight delay are; SOLP is attempting to release numbers in a more positive stock market environment, management wants to issue some sort of 1st quarter (12/31) pre-earnings announcement in conjunction with year-end numbers or there is a merger in the works. The last reason is that previous quarter numbers must be restated which is doubtful.

Regards,

Tom



To: Bill Driscoll who wrote (227)12/30/1997 9:58:00 PM
From: Thomas Kirwin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 295
 
Earnings Report Extension Filed by SOLP With SEC on 12/29

Hello,

I talked to Peter in SOLP's payroll department regarding earnings. He indicated that a fifteen (15) day filing extension was made. Earnings are delayed until January 15th but may be reported before the fifteen (15) days are exhausted.

Uh, Oh.......

sec.gov

Item #3 on the filing comforts me just a little.

<<Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements to be included in the subject report or portion thereof?>>

[ ] Yes [X] No

Regards,

Tom