SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy of Death, Disease, Depravit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (302)1/13/2016 9:19:00 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
Greg or e

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1308
 
"In a text that is coursing about on social media, professional God-slayer Richard Dawkins begrudgingly admitted that Christianity may actually be our best defense against aberrant forms of religion that threaten the world.




Professional Atheist Dawkins Says Christianity ‘Bulwark Against Something Worse’ - Breitbart


Professional Atheist Dawkins Says Christianity ‘Bulwark Against Something Worse’

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/01/12/professional-atheist-dawkins-says-christianity-bulwark-against-something-worse/



To: Brumar89 who wrote (302)2/1/2016 3:39:21 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Solon

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1308
 
There is much wrong with that article. But let's just start at first principles. Let's assume there is some mystical being aka Allah, God, Buddah, Chief Mumbo Jumbo in The Sky, that all those blokes invented as supernatural deities in their image so that each was the other giving the interpreter right to rule over other people, and of course to take their money and the girls. Isn't it odd how it was always men in alpha male dominance hierarchy totalitarian territorial tribalism with genocidal propensities who got the special word at the top of a mountain or somewhere which meant everyone else had to do what THEY said. Why would you think a woman didn't have the fun of being given the special word?

Who do you propose does the interpreting of the mystic monster's motivations and instruction of such to the heathen masses? The common answer is "Oh it's all right there in the Bible/Koran". Right there is where the collectivist MADness goes off the rails. Those are just pieces of paper written by some primate a short time ago or a long time ago.

You might just as well believe whatever I tell you I got at the top of a mountain. I can write a scroll for you if that will help your belief.

The rest of it was tendentious twaddle and silly assertion. For example:

<Morality cannot be derived from science>

Mqurice