Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (914567)	1/15/2016 12:01:55 AM
From: Bonefish	Respond to of 1575767

The Republicans have real knock down drag out debates. The dems have kindergarten debates. Can't blame zax from watching the real thing.

To: locogringo who wrote (914567)	1/15/2016 4:25:10 AM
From: FJB	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo longnshort Respond to of 1575767

New Obama Mantra: “Things Are Not Terrible” (Video) Jan 14th, 2016 5:07 pm by Jim Hoft From “Hope and Change” to “Things are not terrible.” Barack Obama new mantra epitomizes a failed presidency in four words. ...

To: locogringo who wrote (914567)	1/15/2016 6:35:53 AM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Respond to of 1575767

Trump vs. Hillary and Bill Clinton: Confusion at the New York Times By Michael Goodwin Published January 11, 2016 New York Post (AP) Quick, call an ambulance — or a bartender. The Old Gray Lady has fallen and can’t get up. In a piece that is either hilariously tipsy or an example of staggeringly creative hypocrisy, New York Times editorial writers twisted themselves into knots over Donald Trump. In just nine paragraphs in Friday’s paper, they managed both to denounce Trump’s dive into the Clinton sexual swamp while simultaneously repeating some of the juicy stuff. Talk about wanting it both ways. The unsigned editorial starts by insisting that Trump sees “his role as the person who dredges up what nobody else wants to talk about.” After recounting Hillary Clinton’s accusation that Trump is sexist, it then says Trump is “way out of line for bringing up Mr. Clinton’s philandering.” So far, so predictable. But suddenly the editorial makes a U-turn and wants to join Trump in talking about the Clintons and sex! It admits that Hillary has a record of “attacking the character of women linked to her husband,” and recounts an exchange where a New Hampshire voter confronted Hillary with the names of three women — Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones — who accused Bill Clinton of rape or harassment. The Times called Hillary’s response “odd and unhelpful” before remembering that it came to bury Trump, not agree with him. It said he was wrong to link her to an “ancient scandal” and climbed back on its high horse to conclude, “There should be no place for that kind of politics in this country.” Yes, there shouldn’t be, but thank God there is.