Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (2914)	1/17/2016 2:20:38 PM
From: GMPInvestor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

Hey chief I'm glad to see you are back to making your wild, pie in the sky calculations again. No sir you are dead wrong. Zenyatta has all of the best graphite and your lousy, 2a-bit company has none. Take a walk bozo and take your TCC clown base with you. You have no clue. Amateur.

To: the Chief who wrote (2914)	1/17/2016 2:24:00 PM
From: NuclearCrystals	Respond to of 12350

Chief, come on man, you know that your number is still way to high as 75% is global recovery and is not reflective of actual application viable subsets of that global recovery. Zenyattas own presentations show that once specific applications are reflected, the useable amounts drop drastically.

To: the Chief who wrote (2914)	1/18/2016 9:05:25 AM
From: Luvin_It	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

There is just so much here Chief, where to start. Firstly, people can post what they want, we live in a free society so its not up to me to "allow" or "disallow" something. Secondly, I believe Valuhunters numbers are low. I still think this will be 2.5-3M tons when its all said and done, this is open at depth. You know as well as I do that the PEA is extremely conservative and the cut off grade will be lowered. Its funny how in one breath you poo poo the PEA and make up numbers like $600M in capex when we know the the number in there was padded and will ultimately be lowered to less than $300M. Then in the next breath, where its convenient for you, you rely on the PEA to try and discredit Zen. So which is it, reliable or unreliable, you cant have it both ways. Finally, Zen supporters can't say anything according to you, yet you come on here and tout a $450M market cap for CCB who hasn't even released a PEA, no end user agreements, let alone a single end user saying the CCB material works for any application. etc. A little hypocritical....No? "Luvin_it I will ask you a question to see if you are a man of your word. You said you would "study" my answer from the last time you asked a question. Now its my turn. Why are you allowing people like ValuHunter to make a ridiculous post on the ZEN Info Board? Prior to the PEA, we all said ZEN has 1.4million tons as a result of the 43-101 Now that the PEA is out, why are you still allowing people to use 1.4million tons? You know the cutoff has been raised from .6% to 1.6% and you know that recovery is no higher then 76% Yet you continue to support the idea you have 1.4million tons, when you know what you have is at best 664,000 tons which is less then half of what ValuHunter uses in his calculations. Do you notice your name on the Recco list? Message 30409102"