Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (2925)	1/17/2016 3:46:33 PM
From: LearntoTrade	Respond to of 12350

NC, if I took 1000Kg and processed it with their process (caustic bake), what would the deltas or spreads look like for; 1) the various elements for lib use and nuclear use? 2) Would they 'fit' the known requirements? 3) the purities vs mesh size etc? I can't find data for all mesh sizes. 4) did they process enough material of statistical value to concretely give scientific answers to these questions? I don't wish to bash but seek truths. My answer is that the data simply does not exist, or I have not been able to find it. Now lets compare situations. one of the stocks has the PEA, has the resource given. So you know what you have to a point. Though much has been questioned and discussed in detail. All is not well until you do a pilot scale run and get full analysis from SGS or Evans analytical. then there is the other that is waiting for a PEA and 43-101. It too has some knowns from the past data of Miller. It also has present data from lab to pilot scale commercial production with 3rd party verified results and ASTM criteria met for nuclear applications. Natural CCB set a new standard of purity. They know much but still waiting for PEA.