Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Zentek Ltd. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayverider1 who wrote (7040)	1/18/2016 1:14:30 PM
From: Sam	3 Recommendations Recommended By 53and10 Steakhouse Tbill89 Respond to of 54912

The boss said he would hold out for 10 bucks ,right now about 7 US would look pretty darn good. sam

To: Wayverider1 who wrote (7040)	1/18/2016 1:17:32 PM
From: I_C_Deadpeople	17 Recommendations Recommended By 53and10 Antlizzie Bills16 cbs12311 ejasons and 12 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54912

Thus you still have an unproven $7500 figure The Ballard testing proved the Albany graphite to be at least equal to synthetic they have been using, and we know they have been paying over $15,000 US for that .

To: Wayverider1 who wrote (7040)	1/18/2016 2:37:19 PM
From: occamsrazor	10 Recommendations Recommended By Bills16 Canseco cbs12311 Glorieux IronMan07 and 5 more members Respond to of 54912

You will never get any company coming out and saying that they pay XXX for their graphite. Why would they? A battery manufacturer's graphite cost (battery ready and coated) for its anode is in the range of $11,900- $16,400 USD per ton. Cost various depending on where the anode is produced and whether natural, synthetic is used.

To: Wayverider1 who wrote (7040)	1/18/2016 3:23:28 PM
From: ValuHunter	18 Recommendations Recommended By Antlizzie Bills16 BNStrader cbs12311 ejasons and 13 more members Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54912

Value you stated in an earlier post that it might not be possible to find fault with your numbers. You've also stated here that people/the market is out of whack with reality and yet you are throwing numbers around of the value of Zen shares to the tune of $122 (per share). I never intended to suggest that its not possible to find fault. If fact Wayverider1 there are problems with the numbers that I put out Friday as was pointed out to me via a couple of private posts. If Steak had brought up the fact that I failed to reduce the size of the resource by 25% to account for the 75 % recovery rate, which was identified in the PEA results, then I would have accepted his comments and made adjustments. Instead, he claims to be an accounting major, identifies no specific problem with the calculations I put out there, but claims the bash crew would find fault so he is challenging the numbers. Its fine to challenge the numbers but on what basis is he challenging the numbers. Challenging posts is good but be specific why and provide reasoned arguments. Steak wonders why no-one challenged the #s I put out. Maybe no-one challenged me because the numbers are the numbers. Its not like I was making them up. Anyone with a little common sense and knowledge of how deposit values are calculated can do what I did. In fact before Chief turned to the dark side, for whatever reason, he was publishing even higher per share values than I put out on Friday. Folks seem to have forgotten the real value play here. I will be posting the facts a lot more often going forward. I am heavily invested in Zen and I'm tired of the bashers constantly trying to minimize the value of this company por its merits. If you have good reason to challenge something then please do so with reasoned arguments. Good debate is healthy! VH