Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Darby who wrote (3031)	1/18/2016 7:06:28 PM
From: GMPInvestor	Respond to of 12350

Hey Danby are you upset because Zen was up 12% today?? Boohoo here's some tissues. Hey by the way any word on my nuclear marble toilets? Zenyatta discovery of the year and stock of the year. Ccb huh what's that? Zen to twenty!

To: Darby who wrote (3031)	1/18/2016 8:47:51 PM
From: LearntoTrade	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12350

HH sells on RBC as I thought I read by them a month or 2 ago? So lets say they move this up on low volume to 89 or possibly 1.00, what then if nothing to support it. Short back down again or do they get new info detailing plans of PFS or finish the metallurgy, or announce pilot plant to prove the deposit is actually viable. I also realize CCB does not have a 43-101 resource estimate. It is also very different to define a resource based on vein type deposits. But, if they continue to fly the property over the spring and summer months, the rolling resource concept has merit. But note that they do not need a gigantic resource in the space they are going after. I read Chiefs 500,000 guestimate, which is probably reasonable considering what is known from the past data, the map of the property and size (100 KM^2). Also noteworthy is that they executed on a regional high definition VTEM airborne survey by Geotech Ltd. (25 km2 - Totaling 336 line-km) along with PhiSpy (real-time ground TDEM) surveys. So as I understand the charts I can get my hands on, the real issue of chasing the veins is a matter of resolution and dimensionality. Work with me for a moment. Lets look at the illustration I quickly drafted in AutoCAD below. Simplistic, yes, but illustrates my point. Drilling veins is not easy. They need to combine depth image with top image and render to a dimension 3D type of image. There must be such a system developed, or in development. Or combine 2 or 3 systems of data. I'm looking into this so will check GEO sites, SGS etc.