SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (67986)1/19/2016 10:11:16 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
dear anonymous fountain of bovine excrement eRICO, Only a science comprehension moron would believe using samples of temperature points every several thousand square miles of the Earth would believe the result would be more accurate than simultaneous sampling of thousands of square miles integrated in satellite perspective.

And only a generic moron would believe that all the members of the small set of temperature measurement sites have anywhere near the traceable calibration of satellites even with the silly speculations of the anonymous skeptical science dufie.




To: Eric who wrote (67986)1/19/2016 11:26:03 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
Thomas A Watson

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 86355
 
NASA used to say satellites were the best. Then the satellite measurements began to show a pause. So the former best has to be attacked.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News