SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (68005)1/19/2016 5:48:45 PM
From: Eric  Respond to of 86355
 
Yup,

Carl Mears, Vice President and Senior Research Scientist at RSS believes that surface temperature measurements are more reliable than satellite measurements.

Ben Santer Interview Part 1

published on 19 Jan 2016

Ben Santer PhD, of Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, interviewed in San Francisco, December 2015. Part 1.

youtube.com



To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (68005)1/19/2016 7:59:26 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
they certainly agree with each other better than the various satellite datasets do!).

Maybe that's because they have homogenization programs on the surface datasets? If you adjust temperatures to match others they'll have more agreement.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News