SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (6709)12/26/1997 1:14:00 AM
From: Sherman Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Maurice,

I think you meant fission reactor, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. There are no fusion reactor power stations.

Sherm



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (6709)12/26/1997 3:35:00 AM
From: Caxton Rhodes  Respond to of 152472
 
Maurice- Chernobyl was a horrific disaster. Unacceptable and no excuses. The accident was caused by violations of numerous safety procedures and precautions. There was no containment building to contain the radiation released into the air. The design of the plant was obviously inadequate. The explosion was a steam explosion (not nuclear) and the resulting fire was the carbon material used for neutron moderation which ended up burning like a briquette filled with radioactive fuel products. There are no similar reactor designs anywhere except those in Russia. A containment building ( a bubble surrounding the reactor that has walls that are minimum 10 ft thick of concrete and woven steel) surrounds virtually all commercial reactors outside Russia and would have prevented the massive release of radiation. The costs associated with preventing any similar event are a NECESSARY PART of nuclear power and certainly have made building them uneconomic, at least where alternative are available. No nuclear power plant should ever be built or continue to be operated where a such a consequence is possible! Newer designs make such events physically impossible to occur.

As far as bombing reactors, the fuels used are not even close to weapons grade, you don't get hot rain or even a bigger boom. If you want to kill people its much easier to bomb a city.

Yes the U.S. nuclear industry deposits money in a trust fund to decommission it plants. The plants in the U.S. pay a portion of their revenues into the fund until it is adequately funded, and they ARE adequately funded for decommissioning. Electric ratepayers have picked up the cost.

My comments on detecting any problems that come up was specific to waste storage facilities. Basically you dig a hole in the side of a mountain that is solid rock where water hasn't been for millions of years and you place the expended fuel encased in steel into the hole and close it. If anything geologically starts to happen you have about at least a couple of thousand years to do something about it, like move it somewhere else. The only good thing about radiation leakage is it's easy as hell to detect. Even a slight change in any of the storage facilities is easy to spot. If you had to move it, its not hard to move, its in steel containers. It would also be pretty impregnable to bombs and the likes of Saddam and McVeigh, and also a waste of time if you want to kill people.

The real problem is that reactors can be specially designed to make weapons grade fuel which could them be used to fabricate nuclear weapons. That is a significant issue. Normal nuclear power plants do not produce weapons grade anything.

In summary, my comments were directed at the technology for handling nuclear waste products and that existing technology makes the storage facilities safe. It's only politics and where to put them. As I said, I gave up carrying the nuclear power flag. Who wants to use something that you have to be that careful of? Much rather drive my car calling on my Q phone, maybe not :)

Anyway I don't want to talk about no more boss!

I'm just glad MSFT isn't building any nukes so qdog would be on my ass too!!!

Be happy, Korea's up 6.7%, and as Elton John said, The Bliss is Back!

Caxton