Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stitch who wrote (143)	12/26/1997 3:43:00 PM
From: Rational	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9980

Stitch: There are many Asian companies too who own equity (a lot of it) in the US. For example, the Japanese hold a lot of US equity and Treasuries. At some point in time the Japanese held 40% of US Treasuries and there was a hue and cry in the US about it -- this did not mean that the Japanese controlled the 40% of the US government as some in the US often pointed out. The basic point is that the Asian nations have been opposed to ownership of banks and they still are. [Even in the US Texans are opposed to Yankees owning their banking system, and so on.] Clearly, Americans are unwilling to buy weak banks in Asia. For example, yesterday, Citibank refused to buy an ailing bank in S Korea. The banks that are doing well do not need foreign participation. Foreign banks find it expensive and risky to have a network of branches in a different country. Observe that Citibank has found it hard/costly to have many branches in Illinois, Texas, etc. Thus, by nature banking has remained very parochial, although theoretically there appears to be no hurdle. Yes, I would like to have hard data before accepting that American companies hold 60% of banking and insurance business elsewhere in the world. Sankar