SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (3237)1/20/2016 3:21:47 PM
From: JayfishRespond to of 12350
 
Clydes that's an interesting point if true.
The stockpiles as shown in pictures appear to without any marble as opposed to what is described in the limited drill results released so far .
It cannot be easy to trace veins within the marble and such make the economics less likely to be positive



To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (3237)1/20/2016 3:26:11 PM
From: turkeyfartsruleRespond to of 12350
 
feathers are flying whilst answer being fabricated



To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (3237)1/20/2016 3:45:19 PM
From: klondikekidRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 12350
 
canadacarbon.com

"During definition drilling for the marble and graphite Resource Estimates and PEA, extensive zones of disseminated graphite in a white marble host have been encountered. In order to provide accurate metallurgical data for the PEA, a composite sample of this material was prepared, and submitted to SGS Canada (Lakefield), for bench scale flotation trials under the optimized conditions developed during the Company’s pilot plant scale flotation concentration program. The results of two flotation trials were very similar: Trial 1, 54.6% of the concentrate reported to the +80 mesh (large flake) category, with 34.1% in the +48 mesh category; and, Trial 2, 55.9% of the concentrate was +80 mesh, with 35.3% in the +48 mesh category. The graphite concentrate from both trials was recombined to represent “run of mill” material, and was thermally upgraded by a commercial nuclear graphite processor, using the method previously reported (link below). This yielded graphite of 99.9995% (Ct) purity, with an Equivalent Boron Concentration (“EBC”) of 0.917 ppm."

"The disseminated graphite in marble sample processed by SGS at bench scale was composed of quarter-split drill core (NQ size) obtained from 14 diamond drill holes. Up to five samples were collected from each hole, for a total of 45 samples, with a total mass of 38 kg. The samples were collected from widely separated occurrences of disseminated graphite in marble mineralization, with the goal of providing a metallurgical sample with 0.5% graphite content. (To view a map of the sample locations, please refer to: canadacarbon.com ) The 38 kg of material was crushed and homogenized at SGS. The calculated head grade obtained from these low-grade flotation trials was 0.53% graphite. As the post-purification results of the disseminated graphite were similar to those obtained from the pilot plant flotation material with a calculated head grade of 7.63%, the Company is confident that thermal upgrading can yield ultra-high purity graphite over a variety of potential head grade scenarios."



To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (3237)1/20/2016 5:18:46 PM
From: the ChiefRespond to of 12350
 

Mr Chief is it true that the samples CCB have tested have only come from historical stockpiles or hand picked trenching samples and none of the drill core were used?


I would say thats mostly correct. They started off drilling, I did not like the stock for that reason. Then they went the way of Physpy and cross cuts. Since the change in direction they have dug huge trenches with hi-hoes. some as long as 125 feet long, 10 feet wide and 12 feet deep. Samples from these areas have been sent off and GDMS'd the last was a .53% sample from the trenching and it came in at 99.9995%
So I would say 99% are not from drill holes up till now. However the 43-101 which was made up from alot of drilling over the last 11 months will be based on drilling as well as open trench and channel sampling. There is no other way to quantify veining.

So if this is true none of the tests involved a true representation of graphite embedded in marble which would be more typical?

hmm not true, even the stockpiled stuff is graphite in Marble. I am not sure if we do have graphite in anything else but marble. except perhaps in the rip between the solid veins and the marble contact point.