Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (916044)	1/21/2016 10:21:43 AM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573943

IOW you don't believe the stuff you posted. San Francisco has no rising seas threat. At least not this millennia.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (916044)	1/21/2016 10:22:38 AM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Recommended By Bonefish FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573943

1998: Science mag treated peak oil as "settled science" A quick reminder on 'peak oil' By Henry Percy The Wall Street Journal recently printed an excerpt from "The Next Oil Crisis Looms Large – and Perhaps Close," printed in the Aug. 28, 1998 issue of Science magazine. According to a study from the International Energy Agency of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, "sometime between 2010 and 2020 the gush of oil from wells around the world will peak at 80 million barrels per day, then begin a steady, inevitable decline." Well, not quite. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, in 1998, when the article was written, global oil production was 75.7 million bbl/day. In 2014 it was 93.2, and our problem is too much oil. It's useful to remember such things when the "experts" grandly tell us what's going to happen. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/a_quick_reminder_on_peak_oil_comments.html