Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (916353)	1/22/2016 1:51:26 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578505

While it is technically true that people theorized it many years ago the big money is a fairly recent development. So who was funding it before? I mean, if your claims it is false science, who was funding and promoting it before? The Illuminati? The Gnomes of Zurich? Care to try to explain WHAT? If I had a lot of money I would be spending it to get the facts out on the global warming fiasco, too. Of course. And the fact that fixing the problem would impact their bottom line has nothing to do with it. Just like the tobacco companies spending all that money challenging the link between smoking tobacco and lung cancer were doing it out of purely altruistic reasons. The fact that the deniers are using the very same techniques and even the same people to challenge climate change is a just a wild coincidence... Are you a smoker, Dave? Were you? Were you are believer of the anti-cancer link propaganda? Maybe even benefited from the money spent on fighting the science linking smoking tobacco to cancer?