Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (30370)	12/26/1997 12:39:00 AM
From: KMT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs: Forgive the improper analogy. What I said was open to too much differences in interpretatoin. To be clearer, it can be said that you and RG are working in tandem here to promote RMIL just as you're saying SM / MK are working together to short other stocks. I'm not saying that you have some hidden agenda, nor do I believe SM / MK have one. In fact, at this point I believe you and RG actually believe in what you're saying. That doesn't make it true though. You can be sincere and be sincerely wrong. I've been there, done that, and I'll probably be there and do it again. Wouldn't it be nice if we could all pick winners all the time. KMT PS. Pugs, you said yourself that you can't guarantee there's a short squeeze. I've gone through all the channels I know of to try and verify how many shares are restricted. I can't do any better. I've asked yeahs here many times to show me why I or anyone else should believe there's a pending short squeeze. The numbers don't seem to agree with you and RG. I'm quite open to be proven wrong for the sake of the shareholders of RMIL. Ellen tells me to prove there is no squeeze. The numbers themselves prove it.