Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (916633)

1/23/2016 11:48:22 AM

From: Wharf Rat

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573558

Those are your choices.

I'm going with choice 3...
"I believe you ask stupid and childish questions"
=

"it was stupid of you to try to divert the issue from the liberal junk science study to a CA v TX murder rate question."

Uh, you attempted to change the subject right here. I'm glad you noticed.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (916532)

1/22/2016 6:03:43 PM

From: Wharf Rat

1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 916636

"they probably have the same gun death rate"

Or, they don't...

Firearms Death Rate per 100,000

California

7.4

Texas 10.7

kff.org

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (916537)	1/23/2016 10:22:36 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 916637

Rat, do you believe America and Canada's murder rate is higher than Sudan's? Y / N

-

If you want to go further back, it was about sea level rise...

To: Brumar89 who wrote (916347) 1/21/2016 7:21:37 PM
From: Wharf Rat Read Replies (1)
916351
of 916640

Reagan started the BCDC in '69; no more filling in the Bay.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (916351) 1/22/2016 8:26:24 AM
From: Brumar89 Read Replies (1)
916416
of 916639

Do Pakistan & Sudan really have lower murder rates than the US and Canada?

All liberal science is junk science: