Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Wheeler who wrote (4559)	12/26/1997 8:16:00 AM
From: J.L. Turner	Respond to of 14226

Hi Scott, Regarding your thoughts on sharing information between the various desert dirts.I like many other investors have purchased several of the companies to diversify my risk.The thought of all rising has a certain appeal to me,as it does to most investors.Considering the personalities developing the extraction processes, Johnson at naxos,hewlett at maxam;I think it is highly unlikely that either would want the opposing process to become "the extraction process' of choice.They have spent their lives developing their process.And it wouldn't necessarily be bad for the investors if various extraction processes are developed as the different dirts will probably need different processes to maximize metal extraction from each unique desert property.

To: Scott Wheeler who wrote (4559)	12/26/1997 10:56:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Robert, first there is some competition (some time ago, some of IPMCF top guys used less than complimentary terms to describe Jensen, an uncalled for event). But the most important thing is that the ores of the different participants are quite different and what could be profitable for GPGI would be a losing proposition for others. GPGI has about 8 oz of goodies per ton in the beneficiated pile, while IPMCF would be lucky to show something near an once. This means that GPGI can afford to pay even $1000 to process a ton and still be swimmming in profits, but if IPMCF were to use the same process they would be wrapping every once of goodies shipped out with green bills worth $700 or so. Zeev

To: Scott Wheeler who wrote (4559)	12/26/1997 12:46:00 PM
From: francis terry	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Good Morning Scott--Good idea the DD teaming together for a common cause. Never happen, or as much chance of success as a colledge playoff to determine a National Champ in football. Greed keeps most good things from becoming a reality, Glory in in there some place, oh yes Gold figers inalso, the three g that kepps us from being the best that we can be. Now I. say you had good idea on developing tech. howabout one good refinery, . While we are wishing I hope in the new year GPGI can secure a good production person or persons. Francis Terry

To: Scott Wheeler who wrote (4559)	12/26/1997 4:52:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Scott, I like NUMBRER THREE..it is THE next logical step: <... 3) If research talent were pooled and extraction technology shared, all would more likely find profitability a heck of a lot faster than each individually groping around in the dark. I know the odds of all these guys buddying up tomorrow is a bit much to expect, but I think it bears some thought and dialogue. ...>> ChucasaladbarofSTUFF...DD with Vinegar.