SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (38430)1/25/2016 7:06:34 AM
From: Fintas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45644
 
I'd prefer the point after conversion in the first quarter with some 45 minutes plus to go then completing that 2 point conversion.

I'd have also preferred to see them take the 3 and then have the chance to hold and then get the 6 and no need for a 2 point conversion.

HOWEVER.. The Bronco's from the get go were all over TOM B. And I would suspect OL TOM B is a bit sore today physically and at his O line. It was hard to watch as some of those defense types seemed to have a clear path from either side. HELLO does anyone want to block. I thought I was watching a scene from the movie with Burt Reynolds in it and the O line just laid down to allow the defensemen hit Burt R as quarterback.

So put that one behind us.

Now to see IF the Broncos can stop the Panthers.. IN with the NEW i.e Cam N and OUT with the OLD i.e Peyton M

We shall see.

Fintas



To: Bill who wrote (38430)1/25/2016 2:30:51 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45644
 
It would have been a blowout if they had played Osweiler.

Nah... Osweiler is fine as a backup QB, but he doesn't have enough real game experience yet to blow out any team. The final score would have been similar because it was the Denver defense that made the difference.

EK!!!