Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steakhouse who wrote (6232)	1/25/2016 9:14:56 AM
From: NuclearCrystals	1 Recommendation Recommended By hoperrs Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22811

Steakhouse, you should believe the pressers just try to understand what they actually are telling you. The way the stock is behaving, there are still some trading ops to be had off the back of the market massagers. Make money off of them and not the other way around.

To: Steakhouse who wrote (6232)	1/25/2016 5:20:25 PM
From: LearntoTrade	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mister D Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Steakhouse, what do you get out of reading the following post? I only pasted what another posted. Are the tests based on the same samples? Yes or no. Now answer why. You don't have to answer publicly, but you should know the answer. So the one small sample set is making its rounds, getting tested by all these NDA'ers, but there is more for them to do. If this is the play of all plays, they would be diving into addressing what needs addressing, as outlined in the PEA or RPA report. The wording is quite crafty but the 'truth' is in there. Go re read the link Message 30424206 You have to decide for yourself, make a decision and live with it. It really is that simple. All the Best,

To: Steakhouse who wrote (6232)	1/26/2016 11:16:46 AM
From: the Chief	3 Recommendations Recommended By hoperrs naimarantz techsupport Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 22811

. The ZEN NR's are vetted so I tend to believe them. Unlike CCB and other Graphite companies who have put out NR's and have had to pull them back and re-write them, ZEN has not. Better check your info again. The only nr's sent to IIROC in advance of release is CCB's NRs ZEN NEVER SUBMITS, and says so at the bottom of thier NR What you should be doing is looking more thoroughly at what is being said. G says that the Albany graphite is the right size out of the ground. Its not true but even if it was it would have a purity of 46-60% He is trying to convince people that this is what BLD is using lol However if he can con enough people into believing "Naturally pure" means its right out of the ground then he has the best con going on SI! One of the mistakes I see you make on a regular basis is purity and tonnage Purity is defined in flake size groupings. Which means you could have a ton of Albany graphite purified but in that one ton have 8 different purities. Glorieux wants you to believe its 99.9x% Here is the "trick" AE uses. He never specifies if the purity he talks about is confined to a specific flake group and what that group/size is, nor how much of that flake size is contained within that ton,and most importantly whether its a useable flake size! So for an example lets suppose AE has been using 40 micron flake as his measure of 99.9x% What he does not tell you is what percentage of the ton (if he ever had one) would represent that flake size. He then does not tell you the remainder of the purities. So sticking with 40 micon, what if 40 micron is the least important flake size to BLD and 20 is most important and 20 micron is 99% would you feel you were being mislead? What if 20micron was 1/10th of the ton? So before arguing a point, you should know what the point is, the issues are and, the lack of supporting info from ZEN to refute any of this!