Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GrumpyGus who wrote (3435)	1/25/2016 7:19:52 PM
From: turkeyfartsrule	Respond to of 12350

Grumpy, your more likely to come up with that than I, I can't possible hope to understand the minds that assign an astronaut to their advisory board and employ a fellow who has a pension for writing about butter tarts as it's technical writer. pretend you are the Chief give it a try!

To: GrumpyGus who wrote (3435)

1/25/2016 7:25:02 PM

From: LearntoTrade

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12350

Was there perhaps 2 regarding CCB retraction/ correction? Indicative pricing was one such re-state. I believe the other related to website presentation.

BTW,

From: LearntoTrade

1 Recommendation

Recommended By
jiggydo

of 6241

Here you go, copy and paste.

"These initial tests, conducted by an independent lab, show that the performance of coated and shaped Albany graphite is equivalent to the leading high quality natural and synthetic graphite in commercial usage today. Testing was conducted by an independent Canadian lab using a lab scale sample provided by SGS solely for the purpose of providing early evaluation on the suitability and effectiveness of Albany graphite in various applications. Similar positive results were also obtained on these samples by separate corporations who are in dialogue with the Company under confidentiality agreements."

Big piece of information disclosed by the NR in that statement.

These Initial tests... coated and shaped ( losses and costs)

Testing conducted by lab with sample provided by SGS for early evaluations

Similar positive results were also obtained on these sample... ( now, which samples do you think they are referencing?)

So obviously, the only info you have is regarding this small sample set of no statistical value. Virtually useless info once it was tested. Now you ask yourself, is the whole deposit like this, all usable 675 tonnes NET of all processing? And what of the cost for coating and processing on a production scale?

Now go seek out the matrix table for the various MESH sizes. Can you find one at production throughput levels? Looks like this one. Commercial scale = tonnage thruput

Can you find data tables comparing lab results with actual pilot plant results as below? Lab vs commercial pilot scale not all the same. That is a major reason why they should do the full scale pilot plant.
Hope this little post helps you sort through facts vs fiction.
I can send you the full info for you to read and analyze. Gonna involve a time commitment on your part though.

I did learn to read with in-depth comprehension for 5+ years and continue to do so. The art is to extract the info given and not just glance over it.
You know, when you read major news like PMI or other economic info, you read the headlines and glance, correct? But once the traders and funds actually decipher the data, the market turns. food for thought