Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LearntoTrade who wrote (3478)	1/25/2016 11:16:37 PM
From: LearntoTrade	Respond to of 12350

There is a lot of info in that post my friends. I'll ask questions tomorrow night, lol. But note the losses in the processing. The extra energy used to deal with the larger uM sizes The losses are large.The standard spheroidizing and micronizing processes used waste up to 60-70% of the mass of total graphite , Also notice to have run of the mine testing. ie. commercial scale pilot plant trials and verifications at ALL mesh sizes. Size matters after all. So the 1.6 estimate is probably nearer 0.675 as has been said by the science community. BTW, read the bio at the bottom of that post. So tell me when they are going to do the full scale run and GDMS with thru put data and verifications. Give me the flowsheet data. That is your game changer or an outfit to help fund these due processes. I'll be 'all in', lol, especially if through a PP at the right price. Cheers PS> School is done for the day.

To: LearntoTrade who wrote (3478)	1/26/2016 12:03:52 AM
From: Jayfish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12350

Excuse me did I read your list wrong.you claimed that Zenyatta didn't make the list. If you look again Zenyatta is at the top of the Advanced Graphite Projects list.