Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glorieux who wrote (3480)	1/25/2016 11:49:47 PM
From: LearntoTrade	Respond to of 12350

G, how many trenches did they dig. What did they find? Yes, there are the drill results or lack off results but it is different than the normal course. The PEA and 43-101 will answer all. Until then, we wait. ZEN was a good trade off the double bottom 71 or low 70's. Good for those that made it successfully. Still not convinced when I look at the chart, but I'm not a TA chart person, though that red down trend is still in effect? Zen to 30, er' 10 or back to 5? Can ya squeak it to 1.00? 1.25/ I know there is some paper waiting.

To: Glorieux who wrote (3480)	1/26/2016 9:37:59 AM
From: GrumpyGus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

OK Glorieux, the resource has to be there, or CCB supporters are in big doo doo. So assuming that part works out, as we must if this discussion is to matter, I'd appreciate your pointing out what other pitfalls could be lurking. I don't see them, but I've already stated (and GMP has been happy to support the notion) that I'm not the greatest investor on the boards. I'm firmly of the belief that if there is a lot of resource, there will be a lot of price appreciation. Where am I going a-kilter here?