Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glorieux who wrote (3507)	1/26/2016 2:51:29 PM
From: Luvin_It	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

Glorieux, having not being overly interested in CCB because of the miscreant bash crew, I hadn't studied the play in any great detail. I think you have just given those that are invested or thinking about investing a lot to think about. I can't wait to hear the response....Shoto, Naimarantz, Grumpy, Chief....or my personal favourite, Darby?

To: Glorieux who wrote (3507)	1/26/2016 3:05:48 PM
From: GrumpyGus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

There is no combination of graphite types at Miller. All vein, or lump, not mix. That eliminates half your concerns right there. Nuclear or high tech are the exact end users that would suit CCB. The prices are excellent, and the need for high purity is absolute. That is the CCB "niche", and it is great for them As for end user verification, CCB has an actual pricing letter, something ZEN has not reported. $12-14K per ton is a nice beginning. So you have provided zero concerns for me, as long as the resource is there. I repeat, I don't see any hangups with CCB proceeding lucratively if/when the PEA announces a viable resource. Thanks for caring though.

To: Glorieux who wrote (3507)	1/26/2016 5:39:08 PM
From: LearntoTrade	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12350

The industry participants know the characteristics regarding CCB graphite. SGS data, through put, GDMS (Evans Analytical Group, NY – Nuclear Purity, by EBC). Just need a viable resource and economics. Then you'll see it kick into a different operation. A decent resource of such exclusive graphite will bring the appropriate commitments. And don't forget, CCB thermal process is starting at 99.1% purity. That massively effect the amount of energy to rapid heat. The ASTM will be the lead in to PBNR's and other very specific applications. Time will reveal all.

To: Glorieux who wrote (3507)	1/27/2016 2:09:24 PM
From: RuddyMongoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

Message #3507 from Glorieux at 1/26/2016 1:42:51 PM First question you may want to ask is how come the other property owners, at each end of the CCB property have vein and flake mixed together and CCB has never said that this could be an issue... Excellent observation Glorieux. If the ends of a geological anomaly have "vein and flake mixed together" it is not unreasonable for investors to suspect that the centre area of that same geological anomaly has similar characteristics until the company officially clarifies the issue. We shouldn't expect any comment from management anytime soon because history has shown that CCB management and supporters only want to talk about positive aspects of CCB. There are only two possibilities here: 1) The Miller property does not have "vein and flake mixed together" so management never discussed it. 2) The Miller property does have "vein and flake mixed together" so management never discussed it. Huuuummmmm? 1)? or 2)? What ever could it be? Huuuummmmm?