Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glorieux who wrote (3606)	1/28/2016 2:14:56 PM
From: Luvin_It	Respond to of 12350

Cause Chief told him Glorieux......LMAO

To: Glorieux who wrote (3606)	1/28/2016 2:26:16 PM
From: GrumpyGus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

I'm not making it an us vs them issue. I'm backing CCB with my thoughts on the information available. CCB's ONE corrected news release was first approved by the OSC, then required to have the wording altered by IIROC, AFTER it was already approved. Simply had an issue with the term "indicative pricing". Because of the fluid and variable nature of the graphite market, there is no standard price, so comparison is very difficult. CCB tried to address that situation in a reasonable manner, but were asked to amend the term. Not a big problem, really, unless you're hoping to make CCB look bad, in which case you exaggerate the severity of the change, and try to make it multiple cases. ZEN has not had to change anything because in many cases they haven't said anything. They do not go into great detail with their numbers, nor do they put everything into nrs, so there really is nothing in there that would require in-depth review. I'm fine with that, but there will come a time when they will have to shit or get off the pot. Since I don't own ZEN, it won't really matter which way it goes. For the loyal shareholders who simply want to make a buck, I hope things break the right way.