Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zax who wrote (918022)	1/29/2016 11:58:33 AM
From: i-node	7 Recommendations Recommended By Bill Brumar89 FJB gamesmistress locogringo and 2 more members Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574005

What is your basis for calling Clinton's mail server "makeshift"? What is your basis for calling her server "repurposed"? What is your basis for calling her server "likely unpatched"? What kind of "security certificate" was her server "known to have operated without"? What on earth is your source for stating this made-up garbage? I recommend you read up on the subject. Starting in late March 2009, mail.clintonemail.com was enabled with a Network Solutions’ digital certificate and encryption for web-based applications like Outlook Web Access. This was 3 months after Secretary Clinton took office. The clintonemail.com domain was registered with Network Solutions in January 2009 – 8 days before Secretary Clinton was confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Therefore, from January to end of March 2009 access to clintonemail.com did not use encryption. venafi.com It is a stupid argument. No one, NO ONE, who is remotely experienced with these subjects, would believe that this server arrangement was appropriate, safe or secure. You have no idea what you're talking about.