To: Dauntless who wrote (1355 ) 12/28/1997 1:23:00 AM From: Cacaito Respond to of 7041
Dauntless: The Original Zorgniotti article the patent is based on is very clear: "Emphasis was placed on the requirements to have coitus and not to expect spontaneous erections without this." I have the full article from the Int. journal of Impotence Research (1994). It is clear sexual stimulation was required, as the subsequent works from Zonagen also did. Just a clarification, not big deal. Bioavailability of the drug is less than 20% from the gastrointestinal mucosa no matter how fast one disolves Phentolamine mesylate (it is still the same compound). Probably this does not matter, the dose they have chosen is based in part in safety issues. Phentolamine and viagra both work better in neurogenic problems which have normal vascular bed in the penis, like in complete spinal trauma. The more vascular problems the least chances it will be effective. FDA will not approved it just for psychogenic ED, it is not necessary and viagra will work well in those cases. It must be effective and safe in organic ED, and that is the aim of the company. The carcinogenic rat extra study was probably a company error now explained as an "FDA change of mind". The company is explaining the extra 2,000 patient long term safety study as better for "the least restrictive use approval", probably the FDA actually required then to go that way because of high safety concerns and lack of data. Just more delay. Bruce, Von Elmster is just "holding", was he buying at $40? Dauntless, please provide the name of the drug approved in France. Viagra will not be the cheaper one, vasomax will be. This does not matter a lot except for some market pressure on viagra. The company talk about mexican sales early during the year as something soon (read the IBD article on Zonagen again), and this never happened, I strongly doubt they will be able to sell out of the US without FDA approval. Not even in Mexico lax system. The Slide show does not provide with anything that could amount to any prove, just a small peek into the Zonagen trials. But they do have some reference to the type I study (Becker et al, J of U, 1997) I will look for it, sample is small as usual for a type I, if this is from Zonagen original type I, it is very important to look at it. Very strange it is not in the news that it came to a journal (if it did). Maybe they can do like ABTI and buy some small company with real research since the pipeline is just full of preclinical projects (and none a good one).