Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (274785)	2/5/2016 12:17:09 AM
From: fastpathguru	Respond to of 275872

What kind of "stock discussion board" is this, where you can't even post a trade without being lied about and attacked endlessly You lie about me with almost every post. You call me a liar and a SOB then whine when someone tweaks your nose. I don't get my panties in a bunch. You shouldn't either. You're a crybaby. Grow a thicker skin. How do I "lie about you with almost every post?" Calling you a liar is not a lie, it is justifiable and has been justified: You made the original accusation of "retroactive trading", and then ran like a coward when challenged. You have flat out refused to acknowledge my 9/24/2015 trade at $1.67 at all. You won't mention it even to call its legitimacy in question. As if the mere confirmation that you've even looked at it destroys your entire carefully crafted fantasy of EVERYTHING INTEL GOOD EVERYTHING AMD BAD. You've demonstrated that the mere thought of my AMD trade being "up" drives you INSANE. So insane you'll refuse to even acknowledge the existence of my trade. All that makes you a lying SOB. Little Elmer, I'm not lying, and I'm not crying. I'm just calling a lying spade a lying spade, and showing why you're a lying spade using your own words. "Tweaking my nose?" Is that what you call it when you do that thing you accuse ME of doing, i.e. "bringing up long-dead matters?" Add "hypocrite" to the list. Meanwhile, being confronted inevitably results in YOU running to mommy and crying about how butthurt you are about your poor forum's fee fees. And now you're crying when poor Otis' "reputation" is impugned? Poor, poor Otis! "This is a STOCK TRADING DISCUSSION BOARD!" (Which you use to "tweak my nose...") Personally, I think Intel was screwed by the EUC but I don't endlessly demand you and Bozo justify to my complete satisfaction each and every finding by the kangaroo court. I don't keep posting about Nellie the terrible and demand you explain each nonsense statement she ever made. You two can't unbunch your panties and get over it. I let it go. You can't. You mean the case the Kroes-led EUC won against Intel? The case I predicted would be won, and how it would be won (Equally Efficient Competitor and Discount Attribution standards)? I'm fine with it! If you have some claim against it, YOU have the burden of proof, not me. OTOH you DO keep bringing up Intel's "loyalty rebates" to DELL, every single time you wind up the Parts Is Parts campaign. That's not me, that's YOU. We'll see, Elmer. When I'm good and done with you, I'll take a break... And then we'll see who starts the s**t up again. (Emphasis on "again.") For the moment though, I'm having too much fun. fpg