SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (274796)2/5/2016 8:12:21 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (4) | Respond to of 275872
 
You tried to explain. You just don't make any sense.
LOL still playing the rube, huh?
You said you intentionally post typos embedded in your Captain Midnight secret decoder ring code intended to trap us.
No Elmer. I did not "post typos embedded in" my "code". (I know you're being flip, but you sound like an idiot.)

I intentionally placed the wrong price in the text of links posting to the correct trade, to leverage your knee-jerk need to pounce on any perceived weakness. I did it several times, each time with increasingly ridiculous "mistakes."

Apparently, the need to never, EVER, under any circumstances, acknowledge my actual trade is so powerful that you are unwilling to use the original posted trade to correct me.

Now Elmer: I anticipated your reluctance to acknowledge my trade (you're nothing if not predictable), and I applied a pattern to my "mistakes". (It's not quite Price[n]=Price[n-1]+1, but it's not far off... It didn't need to be complicated because even if you happened to recognize it, your "discovery" would just prove my own point.) It was an insurance policy, for exactly the circumstances we find ourselves in now:

A) You aggressively ignoring any context which doesn't fit your narrative, (such as the fact that I've called attention to the fact that I've called you an SOB right to your face, a fact you MUST IGNORE lest you expose the oblivious rube act that you use to cover the fact that you're lying), and

B) you have apparently committed to actually trusting(!) my own sarcastic statement that the prices I placed in the text of my links to the post were actually typos...

BTW, Isn't it convenient how my sarcastic comment about "typos" is the one thing I said that you hold up as absolute truth?
Your posts have intentional typos which is a code that only someone of your genius could possibly figure out.
Actually it's super simple, and I just don't care if you figure it out. Because "outing" my code serves my own agenda.
So nothing you post can be taken at face value
Except for my sarcastic claim that my errors were "typos", AMIRITE?

(A Grand Mystery you solved apparently by investigating and confirming the fact that AMD simply hasn't traded at that price level, rather than simply clicking on the link and showing the mismatch between the text of the link(!) and the price posted in the actual trade linked(!) to. What a regular Sherlock Holmes you are! GENIUS, you might say. L.M.F.A.O.)
because it may or may not be code. Yes may mean no. A trade may not be a trade, or the price may not be the real price.
The posted trade IS. It's sitting right there. Your Official Enemy Trade Recordkeeper MM posted directly in the string of responses to the trade, not ~3 hours later, and raised no flags.

I even offered to take a 1 year ban if you could show that my realtime-posted trade was illegitimate. You declined to take the bet. (Coward!)

For you say that the trade is a lie, over 4 months after it was recorded, is what's known as an "extraordinary claim."

The person making the extraordinary claim carries the burden of proof to show that their claim is legitimate.

You have not even been able to reference the actual trade, let alone carry any "burden of proof" to show that my trade was illegitimate.

The posted price of my trade was $1.67, and the day's range on 9/24/2015 was $1.66-$1.73. A 6 cent worst-case "deception".

Unless you think I have a time machine and can fabricate historical posts out of whole cloth, are you REALLY crapping your pants over a worst-case 6 cent "deception?"
Only you know but you expect us to know even though we don't know the code, or care. We get it already. Sheech... How many times do you have to repeat the same thing?
I don't know, how many times can you ignore everything I tell you and accuse me of retroactive trading, like you did before any of the events you're crying about?
I don't feel the need to follow this nonsense and counter each convoluted point. You sound stressed and I'm getting bored. You should take a vacation and put all this into perspective.
You don't need to follow it, you can just run to mommy and tell her you're a winner. But I'm not going anywhere while you keep posting your BS, it's just too fun to watch you squirm and play the rube.

Let's watch you play that rube and/or run to mommy:

Explain what you think I mean with this line:

"* LOL you SOBs simply can't acknowledge it, can you? Run like the wind, you intellectually dishonest COWARDS!"

in the following post:

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (274690)1/28/2016 10:39:35 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (1) of 274786
You

I wouldn't expect that to ever stop. I don't think he even realizes he's doing it.

What ever are you talking about? Do you dispute my recent well-documented $1.12 AMD trade* prompted by MM's Sally Sobstory post?

fpg

* LOL you SOBs simply can't acknowledge it, can you? Run like the wind, you intellectually dishonest COWARDS!



Twist, Elmer. Spin. (Or run to mommy.) It's what you do.

fpg