SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (919519)2/6/2016 12:52:31 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575115
 
LOL. Bill Nye, the Mechanical Engineer.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (919519)2/6/2016 1:55:07 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1575115
 
you libs have said engineers aren't scientists, you a hypocrite or something



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (919519)2/6/2016 2:16:44 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575115
 
Lysenkoist activists should always be countered by skeptics.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (919519)2/6/2016 2:18:01 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575115
 
Rat, have you, like Europeans, been planting the wrong kinds of trees? Study: “Wrong” kind of trees in Europe Exacerbating Global Warming

Eric Worrall / 16 hours ago February 5, 2016

The Scots Pine – cones (Pinus sylvestris), near Boronów, Poland, By Pleple2000 – Own work, GFDL, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=4522011

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

A study claims that the shift from broadleaf to conifer trees in managed European forests has caused 0.12c (0.21F) of warming in Europe, by reducing the albedo of large areas of land, causing more sunlight to be absorbed.

Abstract

Afforestation and forest management are considered to be key instruments in mitigating climate change. Here we show that since 1750, in spite of considerable afforestation, wood extraction has led to Europe’s forests accumulating a carbon debt of 3.1 petagrams of carbon. We found that afforestation is responsible for an increase of 0.12 watts per square meter in the radiative imbalance at the top of the atmosphere, whereas an increase of 0.12 kelvin in summertime atmospheric boundary layer temperature was mainly caused by species conversion. Thus, two and a half centuries of forest management in Europe have not cooled the climate. The political imperative to mitigate climate change through afforestation and forest management therefore risks failure, unless it is recognized that not all forestry contributes to climate change mitigation.

Read more: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6273/597

Study author Dr Kim Naudts speaking to the BBC;

Removing trees in an organised fashion tends to release carbon that would otherwise remain stored in forest litter, dead wood and soil.

Choosing conifers over broadleaved varieties also had significant impacts on the albedo – the amount of solar radiation reflected back into space.

“Even well managed forests today store less carbon than their natural counterparts in 1750,” said Dr Kim Naudts who carried out the study while at the Laboratory of Climate Science and Environment in Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Speaking to Science in Action on the BBC World Service, she said: “Due to the shift to conifer species, there was a warming over Europe of almost 0.12 degrees and that is caused because the conifers are darker and absorb more solar radiation.”

Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35496350

To me this study drives home how ridiculously overblown the whole global warming issue is.

If this study is right, if opening the wrong packet of tree seeds can cause a 0.12 degree shift in temperature, over a large region of the Earth, what else have climate scientists missed?

The assertion that anthropogenic CO2 is responsible for most of the warming since pre-industrial times, now looks even more preposterous than it did before

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/05/study-wrong-kind-of-trees-in-europe-exacerbating-global-warming/