Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Miller vs Albany ......... where the truth lies or the lie i -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (29)	2/7/2016 1:34:13 PM
From: Tensane 1	1 Recommendation Recommended By jiggydo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70

NC, I doubt if you will have a lot of people from the Zen camp commenting on the differences between Albany and Miller. Why? Because the evidence is obvious, not much they can say except there is no resource...... yet. Once the RE is out, then what, if you are a Zen supporter. Oh yea, the "if you don't bash my stock, I wouldn't bash yours" Really? How childish. There are so many red flags with Zen, I don't know where to begin. I owned Zen, figured out that it was going nowhere and sold all, fortunately before the PEA. I should have been out earlier, but I guess I had some of the rose colored glasses that the longs still wear. I moved on. CCB is a superior deposit and has all what you would look for in a deposit, at surface, secondary credits, the best natural graphite tested ever, and once this gets into production, the numbers should show this to be a huge money maker for a very long time. Time will tell, but based on what we know at present, this could be huge.

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (29)	2/7/2016 2:13:46 PM
From: GrumpyGus	2 Recommendations Recommended By jiggydo Tensane 1 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70

"I just ignore at will, it's that simple." Of all your posts, some of which I agree with, some of which, maybe not, I like that line the best. I have never really understood the reason to have a moderator on a board who can be solely responsible for deciding whether someone can post there or not. It should be as you say; self moderate. The boards with both CCB and ZEN in the title are clear examples of extreme bias in determining who can post. Why should one arbitrarily appointed moderator decide who is allowed to make a point? SI has missed the mark on this issue. Those boards are now useless as information boards, because there can be no back and forth. Indeed, there really isn't even any info presented, simply personal attacks and unsupported claims. I hope this board gets some traction, and both sides try to post intelligently on any topic. But that may be wishful thinking in the extreme.