SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (919756)2/8/2016 10:11:38 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575579
 
So they should segregate themselves there? And do nothing is what the people attacking them want. They don't WANT Jews in their midst.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (919756)2/8/2016 10:13:00 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575579
 
How rich is Bernie Sanders?
By Thomas Lifson
There is a short answer to the question: a lot richer than he admits. And the longer answer is even more interesting. Writing at Doug Ross’s Director Blue, Cliff Kincaid explains:

[former publisher of Campaigns & Elections Magazine James] O’Brien has analyzed the financial status of Sanders and his wife, including their financial disclosure report, and has concluded they have a net worth in the range of $1.2 to $1.5 million, not the $700,000 or less that is usually reported by the media. (snip)



…his wife, Jane O’Meara Sanders, left her position as president of Burlington College under controversial circumstances and is now being accused of federal bank fraud. She left her position at the college and was given a severance package known as a “golden parachute” that also benefited Senator Sanders’ personal wealth.

Hmmm: The old cut-the-wife-big checks-from-nonprofits gambit has a long history among Democrats. But Jane Sanders really should have asked Michelle Obama for advice, because her $200k is chump change compared to the yearly payout Shelly got from the University of Chicago Hospital for keeping a lid on protests when it dumped nonpaying patients on other health care facilities. Of course, there are far more opportunities for this sort of enrichment in Chicago than in Burlington. And, face it, Burlington College was in tough financial shape at the time, with nothing like the resources of the U of C.

as noted by Bruce Parker, a Vermont reporter for Watchdog.org—Senator Sanders should be asked to explain how his opposition to severance packages for corporation executives squares with his wife getting a cushy severance of $200,000.

Then there is a little smoke on Ms. Danders’s banking:

Brady C. Toensing, a partner with the law firm of diGenova & Toensing, has filed a legal complaint with federal authorities requesting an investigation into apparent federal bank fraud committed by Ms. Sanders. His complaint was sent to Eric S. Miller, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Vermont, and Fred W. Gibson, Jr., Acting Inspector General with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Sanders is hiding some of his assets (legally):

O’Brien says that Sanders’ financial disclosure forms are incomplete. “For someone who doesn’t care about money, he goes a long way to cover up his true net worth,” he says. “Bernie does not disclose the value of real estate holdings. He can. He is not required to, but he could if he chose. It is known that he and/or his wife own at least two homes—one with rental income in Vermont and one near Capitol Hill where the median home value is $722,000.”

I have nothing against people buying houses and accumulating a net worth. But if Sanders’s wife executed a hypocritical severance package of the sort Bernie denounces, that is outright hypocrisy. And if he and his wife have accumulated a net worth that makes them millionaires, it sounds bad to his student loan-indebted followers. A million bucks ain’t what it used to be, but Sanders supporters don’t realize that.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/02/how_rich_is_bernie_sanders.html#ixzz3zaVf8Zjc
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (919756)2/8/2016 10:15:36 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575579
 
Dearborn Muslim Who Tried to Shoot Up Church, "It Is My Dream to Behead Someone"

Shoot up a church? No wonder liberals are so friendly to Islam.

February 7, 2016
Daniel Greenfield


Everyone has a dream. I have a dream. You have a dream. Khalil Abu-Rayyan of Dearborn had a dream... shooting up churches and beheading Americans. Now he's in trouble because our Islamophobic country frowns on his religious practices.

Khalil Abu-Rayyan, 21, of Dearborn Heights, allegedly had guns and a large knife and told an undercover FBI agent that he “tried to shoot up a church one day.”

“I bought a bunch of bullets. I practiced reloading and unloading,” he said in an online conversation, the FBI said.

Investigators did not specify which church Abu-Rayyan allegedly was eyeing, but said it has a capacity of 6,000 members, according to a criminal complaint unsealed Thursday in U.S. District Court.

The FBI had been monitoring Abu-Rayyan for months because of his “increasingly violent threats” about committing acts of terror and martyrdom against churchgoers and police officers on behalf of ISIS.

“Honestly I regret not doing it.
If I can’t do jihad in the Middle East, I would do my jihad over here,” he allegedly said.

He also had armed himself with a knife and told the undercover agent, “It is my dream to behead someone,” authorities said.

If I can’t do jihad in the Middle East, I would do my jihad over here.”

But... but let's not jump to any conclusions.

Dawud Walid, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Michigan chapter, is urging caution “and encouraging the broader community to also reserve judgment regarding this matter.”

“We advise people not to jump to conclusions about what happened and wait for all of the facts to come in,” said Muzammil Ahmed, board chairman for the Michigan Muslim Community Council.

Sure. Let's roll out the excuses

1. He was a mentally unstable young man who was set up by the FBI and would never have hurt a fly on his own

2. It's blowback for our foreign policy of bombing people who rape young girls because they're non-Muslims

3. Forget the church attack, Muslims feel threatened by all the blowback from their latest attack plot

And that's done.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/261751/dearborn-muslim-who-tried-shoot-church-it-my-dream-daniel-greenfield