Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (274837)

2/8/2016 9:46:16 PM

From: fastpathguru

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872

I just did. Can't you read?

No, you didn't actually. What you're doing is EVADING, just like you've been evading my trade all along since the beginning of this whole thing.

For the record,

There's no information in my posted trade that can even be false, unless you're actually being a little bitch over a worst-case 6 cent "deception," and
Your original "retroactive trading" accusation was still a lie (which BTW makes anything YOU say suspect, which is already obvious Mr. Operative Word lol), and
You still couldn't fool anyone with the oblivious rube la-la-la-i'm-not-listening schtick. I.e. you couldn't post a link to a supposed "false trade" without exposing yourself to be a complete moron. Go ahead, try it. Go ahead and try to explain why, If I'm such a "liar", I post a link directly to the exact post which would expose the lie while begging you to look at it, repeatedly, yet you can't? And I do it 4 times with 4 different "lies"? Go ahead, tell me you "don't know why and don't care." Again. To anybody, it's obvious why you can't. Because you're a liar and a coward.

Now:

Do you think that the Silicon Investor forum itself is hackable and fundamentally untrustworthy?

If not, then what information exactly in my posted trade can even be considered "suspect?"

(I fully expect you to ignore these very simple, basic questions just like everything else that doesn't fit your narrative. You'll run to mommy and tell her you're a winner.)
Here, I'll even copy the entire post for you; Tell me what's "suspect" about it.

To: Mahmoud Mohammed who wrote (274297)	9/24/2015 1:19:39 PM
From: fastpathguru	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 274840

Mr Guru, Re: "AMD 1.88 +1.1% ... Missed the MM buy signal.... :( fpg" ROTFLMAO ... What a "maroon" again and again. <ggg> Mahmoud Experimentally bought small dose on the MM buy signal. (Thinking about backtesting this algo...) edit: $1.67 fpg

fpg

PS: Still not running from anything, psycho.

PPS: Still haven't seen you twist your way out of your MM-certified MiddleMan ownership, or your acknowledgement that "In retrospect, DELL made a mistake."