To: Elmer Phud who wrote (274885 ) 2/9/2016 10:54:03 PM From: fastpathguru Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872 The one where Elmer thinks I'm scared and bluffing... (LOL)I have no problem with my posts, and I have, will, and would repost any of them. Ok, so you're putting us on notice that you will lie again at will. I expected as much. You can put whatever spin on it you like. Posts like this one make it perfectly clear who's really being disingenuous:To: Elmer Phud who wrote (274690 ) 1/28/2016 10:39:35 PM From: fastpathguru Read Replies (1) of 274885 YouI wouldn't expect that to ever stop. I don't think he even realizes he's doing it.
What ever are you talking about? Do you dispute my recent well-documented $1.12 AMD trade* prompted by MM's Sally Sobstory post? fpg * LOL you SOBs simply can't acknowledge it , can you? Run like the wind, you intellectually dishonest COWARDS!
You can play your oblivious rube schtick, ignore context and content... You can pretend my motive was solely to claim I made a ridiculous, easily debunked trade. So easy to debunk because yes, the price was ridiculous, and also because I linked directly to the actual trade via the text of the "lie" . You can pretend to ignore the sarcasm. You can pretend that there's no in-your-face challenge to acknowledge my trade. And anyone who looked at this post would see right through you. Would see that you are indeed a coward who can't acknowledge my trade. Would see that you did indeed make a false accusation and that you used future posts to retroactively "prove" your case. How dumb do you think people are? You think they'd look at this and not see what a coward you are? Like I said, I have no problem with my posts. They show exactly what I want: That you'd rather act like an oblivious rube who can't sense sarcasm and lets direct challenges slide, than simply acknowledge my trade. fpg