Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : QGLY - Funny Name Great Product. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmk who wrote (7089)	12/27/1997 6:57:00 PM
From: Richard Miller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8960

Harold: I never said Q would not want institutional investors. I suspect they desparately want them. Unfortunately they seem to assume these guys can't read Sec Filings and don't talk among themselves. If you knew there were 5,000,000 shares or so overhanging the market through an SB-2 would you pull the trigger to buy? Not if you liked a paycheck. If you knew the top management had invented a "Founder's Royalty" to help themselves to 5% of the GROSS would you buy? There are more "If's" for institutional investors than Rudyard Kipling could conjure. The answer to your question on AOL is yes. Just go to keyword (Control K)"Company Research" (no quotes marks). Go to message boards "q". It's very much like using Motley Fool, but doesn't have the pompous Fools running the show. Surprisingly it gets alot more action than the Motley Fools Q board. Sure the Stocks 0000 says some stupid things. I mentioned I found some of his statements rediculous. But let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater. Would love to see a denial from Q on the ex Mrs. Jerry Rosen. Richard