Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Information Architects (IARC): E-Commerce & EIP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Runner who wrote (3847)	12/27/1997 9:56:00 PM
From: angel	Respond to of 10786

Everyone who I read here except Tech about a "magic bullet" says this is impossible but I was trying to get opinions from people from ALYD, PTUS, SEEC, and VIAS threads just in case (the companies that Tech says are not fully-automated like CSGI). I have started to read this thread from the beginning because Tech is always comparing CSGI to ALYD and I want to see why ALYD has so many contracts and CSGI has only one. So far in reading about CSGI I find that there is a one year ongoing NASD investigation on them, they have an accumulated deficit of 19 million dollars, and the insiders are lining up like rats on a sinking ship to sell their shares in an s-1 filing. I also notice that they have so many alliances with companies for so long a time and nothing to show from it. If you read the CSGI thread it is a laugh. Everything the longs say is "wait until next week" and "you'll see". These same words were said a year ago!!! Then Tech diverts attention from CSGI by saying how bad ALYD is. Maybe ALYD is a good stock and maybe not but I will make my opinion after finishing reading. But with CSGI I notice that Tech gave buy recommendation on the year 2000 thead when the stock was at 11. Good call NOT!!! because it is now in the 4s!!!