Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (920966)	2/13/2016 10:11:19 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575605

"They said they had places like them in Europe, but they were all privately owned....they were mostly for the wealthy." That's the goal here, too, and not just with public lands. Privatize schools, prisons, SS, roads...

To: bentway who wrote (920966)	2/13/2016 10:37:31 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575605

They said they could go to some of them, if they could afford it - they were mostly for the wealthy. And that is they way it should be. It maximizes the value of the land without the inefficiencies of having government intrusion on its utilization. If you cannot afford the true value of it, why should you have use of it?

To: bentway who wrote (920966)	2/13/2016 3:59:19 PM
From: Taro	1 Recommendation Recommended By rich evans Respond to of 1575605

All bull! I Sweden you can go anywhere and in case that some of the area shares borders with privately owned land, by law ("Allemansrätten", google on it if you don't trust me) anybody can put down his tent right there on that privately owned piece of land - as long as he shows consideration and does not disturb the owner in his home nearby... Germany is different, yes. But who want's to go there - except for the 1million/year new 'immigrants' from Africa and the Middle East? /Taro