Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canada Carbon CCB-V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (1219)	2/15/2016 7:16:39 PM
From: LearntoTrade	1 Recommendation Recommended By GrumpyGus Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1871

Yes semantics aside, the way I would do this is attack the marble slaps because once it is removed, the graphite is exposed if the geology is such that the graphite is literally along side the marble. And extracting the marble will uncover the track of the vein under the light overburden? Now I can 'see' where to drill in an effort to define the resource further. If I'm hitting the pure marble, the graphite is at my feet, lol I believe the drill duds (if they are duds, though why have they waited all this time "pending assay") are attributable to not knowing the vein track at depth. So hit or miss. The pending assay could also be related to conservative spending? Don't assay until such a time that other ducks line up, i.e. like a revenue stream to pay for it, rather than PP. Have the flow sheet and pilot run of mine done. Big cost that are done and now warrant PEA and assaying drills