Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canada Carbon CCB-V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LearntoTrade who wrote (1226)	2/16/2016 10:27:44 AM
From: naimarantz	1 Recommendation Recommended By hoperrs Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1871

LearntoTrade, are you sure trenching cannot be used in a 43-101 resource estimate? I understand that trenching, cross cutting and drilling can be used in 43-101 calculations. Logically speaking if you miss with a drill then crosscut and find the vein, measure the cut width and depth of the vein and send a representative sample into the lab it seems you have better results than a drill passing though the same area. Trenching would give you measurements and samples of the vein in all directions and would only be limited by depth and machine capability. I understand that trenching and crosscutting will contribute significantly to CCB's 43-101 resource estimate and believe it was a good strategic move by management to switch to focusing more heavily on those results while limiting the hit and miss with the drill. Message #1226 from LearntoTrade at 2/15/2016 9:59:29 PM It is a shame the trenching does not count for the 43-101 resource.