SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (59893)2/17/2016 2:12:38 PM
From: SiliconAlley  Respond to of 60323
 
I view your belief as incorrect, and without basis in fact. Once Unisplendour has an interest in WDC, they have an interest in whatever WDC owns. On what basis do you believe that Unisplendour would be excluded from an interest in WDC-SanDisk technology if the Unisplendour transaction closes after the Sandisk transaction? Do you believe that an individual investor has no interest in WDC-SanDisk technology if they purchase WDC stock after the SanDisk acquistion? If not, why do you believe Unisplendour would be treated differently?

And your comments about independant buying on the part of the Chinese have no relationship to an aquisition at $86.50. All that matters, for $86.50, is whether the Unisplendour transaction closes before the SanDisk transaction. You have stated multiple times that $86.50 looks better than ever, but haven't provided any relevant information to support that assertion. In fact, none appears to exist.



To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (59893)2/17/2016 2:16:08 PM
From: joncon63  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Why would the Chinese have no claim to SNDK technology if they wait to invest in WDC until after WDC buys SNDK? That doesn't make sense. They will have acquired a significant stake in WDC one way or the other. The timing should not impact what that investment entitles them to have