Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (188317)	2/19/2016 6:59:01 PM
From: BoonDoggler	1 Recommendation Recommended By SirWalterRalegh Respond to of 213177

Another possible outcome, however, might show that the alleged perpetrator had no role at all but was set up by someone else. Uh, you mean the guy who shot the sh*t out of of that facility? Seriously? Pretty sure the idea that he had a role is not in question. I thought the FBI was allegedly looking for connections on that phone. That phone though, the iPhone 5c, was his work phone. He had another, personal phone, which he destroyed. But the FBI claims they need to get at the 5c because he may have contacted accomplices on it. Seems far-fetched to me. But I think we agree.