Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jan m. who wrote (7959)	12/27/1997 6:12:00 PM
From: Mark Buczynski	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

Jan, I think this might be the source for BMS contract #s..... exchange2000.com Seems reasonable.....Mark in MD

To: jan m. who wrote (7959)	12/27/1997 10:00:00 PM
From: Andrew H	Respond to of 31646

jan--the 36MM figure was well calculated by JDN in his post. However, I believe it was Jenkins in the conference call (transcript available on post 283 of the research thread who gave the figure of about 300K/plant--the release stated 125 plants which would work out to 37.5MM. So its pretty close--also we had a post from TM (7623) stating that Jenkins estimated the BMY work alone would keep 60 engineers working full time for 2 years. Now it is not absolutely certain that TPRO will get the contract for all those plants, but it sure sounded like it was very close to in the bag. Also I believe TPRO has stated that about 40% of the chips they tested were either non-compliant or suspicious. Either they are lying outright to us or the poster who said there was no problem is completely off the wall. I'd bet on TPRO and the research that's been done on the thread.