Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Information Architects (IARC): E-Commerce & EIP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ZOID who wrote (3850)	12/27/1997 8:15:00 PM
From: sibe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10786

Dear ZOID, you wrote, "$8MM for 4QTr and $18MM for 1stqtr98." Please state where you came up with the 1Q figure.

To: ZOID who wrote (3850)	12/28/1997 11:58:00 AM
From: feltburner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10786

Zoid, if I may respond to your question/comment to Jeff, I would agree with your comments if ALYD was a much-scrutinized firm w/ lots of analyst coverage; then the mere meeting of ests. which had already been factored into the stock price would do little further for the stock. However, ALYD has ZERO coverage; analysts that have been telling me for years that the company is a scam (because they blindly listened to ALYD competitors for whom they did underwritings) are JUST NOW admitting that ALYD appears to be a winner. A number of analysts still refuse to admit it and will be shocked to see the co. post $14mm in revs. and 25-30 cents eps in 1Q. If the co. meets its 4Q range, it will give the analysts comfort in future co. guidance and enable them to recommend the stock which in turn will create buying pressure from many who were skeptical or had never even heard of the company. -Felt Burner