SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael d kugler who wrote (30702)12/27/1997 6:56:00 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
I specifically remember Riley G posting NASD and SEC complaint
addresses and encouraged people to use them. I also posted addresses
for complaint agencies. I haven't contacted them. I am willing to
bet the onslaught of complaints from the NAYS on this thread drew
a great deal of attention by regulatory agencies.

Sometimes it is best you don't get what you wish for..



To: michael d kugler who wrote (30702)12/28/1997 3:39:00 AM
From: shades  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Have I talked to the SEC about this? Yes. Can I cause a trading halt? Are you kidding?

WHEN did you talk to the SEC about this, I NEVER recall you admitting to this UNTIL AFTER the halt, did you do this before or after the 100 shares Riley says you had? Was this what you meant when you told Riley you could save him in this stock, I do not know what your SECRET is MIKE D KUGLER, but it stinks to me and smells putrid, as a broker you KNOW what it takes to get the SEC to halt a stock, I DO NOT, YOU ADMIT you have been in many others that have been halted, your experience is far greater than mine, and YES you cannot force the SEC to HALT a stock, but you know how to give them the data they need to do so and single out one of the many companies that may deserve it, and when you do this privately and do not make the rest of us aware of that, that gives YOU an unfair advantage.and the RMILIANS contacted the SEC about delayed CERTS, and made that publicly available, YOU on the other hand provided them with info that in your professional opinion would be enough to HALT this stock and did not MAKE that complaint to the SEC publicly available, is that what you meant when you claimed you could save RILEY, is that why you never bought? I propose a POSSIBLE scenario, you shorts find one of the MANY companies that can be halted, you short the hell out of it, then even if the ignorant investor sees your game and challenges you on the fair battleground of the price and shares game you submit your data that YOU know is enough to halt the stock and then it is halted, and although the company may have deserved it, your preknowledge and experience and shorting of a stock you KNOW will be halted without sharing that with others is EXACTLY what I would expect from a LYING BROKER, it would make sense on all the other issues you attack, you find out which ones have enough info against them that if need be you can get the SEC to look at them and halt them, you short them, you attack them, if the investors get wise to your game you present your data to the SEC KNOWING that is enough for them to HALT the stock and then you win, you have found a way to manipulate the system and CHEAT the very people you claim you are here to save, if true that is PATHETIC. That would explain EVERYTHING that has happened, it makes perfect sense to me, and fits you(a broker out for money) and s martin(your tag team partner), your attacks of various stocks, the halts in many of those stocks AFTER your attacks, the claimed short interest here, it all adds up to me.

The SEC undoubtedly did their own homework here and built their own case for a trading halt. I do not know where they get all their information.

THAT IS BS, YOU ARE THE ONE THAT GIVES THEM WHAT THEY NEED TO HALT THESE COMPANIES, I PROPOSE YOU ACTIVELY SEEK OUT STOCKS THAT HAVE A GREAT HALT POTENTIAL, YOU SHORT THEM, YOU THEN COMPLAIN TO THE SEC WITH DATA THAT YOU KNOW IS ENOUGH TO HALT THEM, THEN YOU ATTACK THE STOCK, a great flaw in our system, you KNOW the SEC does not have time to find all the companies, so you gather data on the ones you plan to short and if a halt seems likely you short away, then even if longs catch you shorts, you data is enough to HALT the stock, there is no way the small investor can win in that scenario, ONLY the SHORT can win, that is unfair, WHEN DID YOU SUBMIT YOUR DATA TO THE SEC MICHAEL D KUGLER?

I know their resources are much better than mine.

AHA, but you knowledge and professionl experience certainly allows you to know which companies have a GREAT halt potential, and I am sure you collect enough data that you KNOW will be enough to get the SEC to HALT it.

This action is not to be taken lightly, as the SEC doesn't do this at a drop of a hat.

But when given ENOUGH INFO by a BROKER on ONE company out of the 20,000 they have to police, it sure makes it easier for them doesn't it?

There is simply no way you can say I caused a trading halt. I didn't file any financials. I didn't put out any press releases. It's about time you all put the onus squarely where it belongs.........on management. They got you into this mess, not me

True, but I do say you know what it takes to HALT a company, you know what the SEC needs to do it, and you SHORT those you know have a good halt potential, how can the little investor win against that strategy, you have found a flaw in the system and you and s martin have exploited it nicely, you have an unfair afvantage and that theory seems to fit your action in this stock as well as all the others you ATTACK, why have I never seen you post about a BUY or a LONG position, because with the SHORT HALT strategy YOU CANNOT LOSE, like you can with a long.