SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jon Koplik who wrote (17791)2/20/2016 11:53:46 AM
From: John Pitera3 Recommendations

Recommended By
3bar
Hawkmoon
mary-ally-smith

  Respond to of 33421
 
Strategist for $1.7 Trillion in Funds Says Rout Has Room to Run

February 16, 2016 — 6:06 PM CSTUpdated on February 17, 2016 — 4:37 AM CS

Don’t be fooled into thinking the rebound in stocks means we’ve reached the bottom, says Marcella Chow, who watches the world’s markets for JPMorgan Asset Management Inc.

The global strategist for the $1.7 trillion money manager says she’s on edge, her clients are panicky and she’s telling them to increase their exposure to bonds while being selective on equities. She’s personally stashing as much as 70 percent of her own portfolio in bonds including U.S. Treasuries. Calm won’t return until China’s economy improves and central banks regain credibility with investors, she said. She says investors are worried oil may fall to as low as $22 a barrel, so for now she’s battening down and trying to avoid volatility.

Global equities have recouped some losses since the end of last week after a selloff that sent them into a bear market for the first time in five years. Oil has climbed back to near $30 a barrel after plunging to its lowest since 2003, banks have shaken off fears about their ability to repay debt, and monetary policy makers from China to Europe have been speaking out to reassure investors. None of this convinces Chow the worst is over.

“Am I worried? Yes,” Chow said in a Feb. 15 phone interview from Hong Kong. “There’s so much uncertainty,” she said. “Equities might not be a wise choice.”

She does see some bright spots, including e-commerce in China. She’s also keen to look into tourism-related sectors. During Chinese new year, Japan and Thailand saw an influx of visitors, which would benefit service sectors in those countries, Chow said.


Treasuries are the best haven from a rout that wiped almost $7 trillion from global shares this year, said Chow, because the Federal Reserve is unlikely to rush to raise interest rates again soon. Fed Chair Janet Yellen said this month continued market turmoil could throw the central bank off course from the multiple increases it forecast for 2016. A measure of U.S. government bonds has gained 2.3 percent this year.

Most stock indexes in Asia fell on Wednesday, with Japan’s Topix index dropping 1.1 percent and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index declining 1 percent.

Gold, which has risen 13 percent in 2016, could easily fall, says Hong Kong-based Chow, who joined JPMorgan last year from Bank of America Corp.’s Merrill Lynch, where she was an economist for emerging Asian countries. She said that past analysis has shown it’s correlated with other commodities. While investors such as KKR & Co. recommend increasing cash as a buffer, Chow says that’s a mistake, too.

“Even though it’s tempting to hold cash given how crazy markets have been, it’s better to go for stable bonds,” Chow said. “At least you can generate a few percentage points in returns.”

Chow says she’s anxious about China’s manufacturing slowdown as the country transforms into a service economy. The official factory gauge signaled a record sixth straight month of deterioration in January. Billionaire investor George Soros said last month the Chinese economy is headed for a hard landing, while hedge fund manager Kyle Bass said the banking system may have losses more than four times those of U.S. banks during the financial crisis.

“China’s growth stabilization story is still unclear,” said Chow. “We have to wait and see what happens.”

Chow says some investors expect oil to fall to $22 to $26 a barrel. “From what I heard, that’s the bottom,” she said. West Texas Intermediate traded at $29.84 as of 7:32 p.m. in Tokyo. Saudi Arabia and Russia agreed Tuesday to freeze output at near-record levels. Oil pared gains after the accord was announced, signaling traders see no immediate end to the global supply glut.

Supply PressureCrude markets could “drown in oversupply,” sending prices even lower, according to the International Energy Agency, which trimmed its 2016 estimates of global demand for the commodity last month. About 150 oil and gas companies may go bust as a supply glut pressures prices and punishes revenues, said energy consultant IHS Inc.

“The oil price has picked up a bit but people are still worried it will test new lows,” said Chow. “And with more stories of oil companies and sovereign wealth funds potentially turning insolvent or losing money and jobs, that’s quite a big worry.”

Central banks are running out of ammo, according to Chow, who says she’s lost faith in their ability to calm markets. She points to how quickly the yen reversed declines after the Bank of Japan adopted negative interest rates. That move itself shows the BOJ is running out of options, she said.

Quelling FearsCentral bank heads have been vocal in trying to quell investors’ fears. People’s Bank of China Governor Zhou Xiaochuan broke a long silence in an interview published last weekend, saying the central bank has stepped up efforts to restore stability in the currency and economy. Mario Draghi signaled the European Central Bank would be ready to take action if snags in the banking sector were impeding monetary stimulus.

Chow argues for waiting until policy becomes more effective. With all the worries, she says now is a time to be cautious, park assets in U.S. Treasuries and watch developments.

“How much more down is there to go? I want to know too,” Chow said. “I’m not feeling very adventurous at the moment. It’s too risky.”

(A previous version corrected the second paragraph to clarify that Chow was speaking of her personal stance on bond exposure, and changed the ninth paragraph to show analysis is not from JPMorgan.)

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-17/strategist-for-1-7-trillion-in-funds-says-rout-has-room-to-run








To: Jon Koplik who wrote (17791)2/21/2016 9:10:05 PM
From: John Pitera5 Recommendations

Recommended By
3bar
Hawkmoon
Jon Koplik
mary-ally-smith
sixty2nds

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Fear and Loathing of Negative-Yield Debt: Bond Trader's Dilemma

by
Lukanyo Mnyanda
Eshe Nelson

It’s not as if Christoph Kind relishes putting his clients’ money into bonds that often pay nothing in interest and can all but guarantee losses.

But Kind is doing just that -- and he’s hardly the only one.

More and more, debt investors are being confronted by a new reality where deepening concern over the global economy has made sub-zero interest rates the norm. In Germany, Kind’s home market, surging haven demand has pushed average yields on about a trillion euros ($1.2 trillion) of debt below zero for the longest stretch on record. Bond prices are so high in Japan almost two-thirds of its government debt have negative yields.




And at a time when teetering financial markets have made security a paramount concern, investors are discovering there are few good options left. Even in the U.S., long the destination of choice in times of duress, Treasuries are in such demand that when their cash flows are converted into euros, yields are even worse than the scant returns on German bunds.

“It’s tough at these levels, but at the moment there seem to be few alternatives,” said Kind, the head of asset allocation at Frankfurt Trust, which oversees about $20 billion. “This is quite a tricky situation. The risk of a selloff in safe-haven assets has increased” as yields get lower and lower.

Despite those reservations, Kind has bought negative-yielding bonds in recent weeks. It’s a response to the extraordinary steps by the likes of the European Central Bank and Bank of Japan to push interest rates below zero and buy more government bonds as they try to jump-start their economies.



This chart shows the percentage of countries whose two-year generic bond yields fall within certain ranges. The dark gray shows that about 34 percent of the 47 countries included had negative yields as of the end of January.
But that’s not all. The willingness of debt investors to effectively pay governments to borrow also reflects increasing skepticism of central bank policies -- and concern those very measures may ultimately do more harm to the global economy than good. Even after central banks around the world spent trillions since the financial crisis on quantitative easing and dropped policy rates below zero for about two dozen countries, the market’s outlook for inflation globally is closing in on post-crisis lows.



While the trade-off of losing a little money for the security of owning government debt when things seem so gloomy might be a small one for conservative investors, there are considerable risks in the mean time.

Last year, fears of deflation and the ECB’s introduction of QE pushed the average yield on euro-area debt to a record-low 0.475 percent and sent those on German bunds toward zero. Then, in the months that followed, faint glimmers of optimism over the outlook the region’s economy helped spark a sudden and violent reversal that caused yields to soar.

By the middle of June, yields on longer-term German debt jumped more than a percentage point and left investors with an unprecedented 13 percent loss in the quarter, index data compiled by Bank of America Corp. show.


Nevertheless, as worries over the economic health of China and the U.S. -- the world’s two main engines of growth -- continue to linger, volatility spreads throughout financial markets and investors question the wisdom of negative rates, government bonds with ultra-low yields remain in demand.

This month, yields on Germany’s two-year notes touched a record-low minus 0.557 percent. The average yield on 1.06 trillion euros of German debt is currently minus 0.05 percent and has been negative every day for two weeks, according to Bank of America. In Japan, yields on about $4.5 trillion of government debt are less than zero, index data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Just last week, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development cut its 2016 global growth forecast to 3 percent from 3.3 percent in November, saying that “financial stability risks are substantial.”

A majority of economists in a Bloomberg survey also say negative rates will be in place at the ECB until at least the first quarter of 2018 and at the BOJ until at least the end of that year.



Benchmark bond yields in G-7 have all fallen below 2%
“Risk-free now now has a cost” and clients are learning that they should accept it, said Mauro Vittorangeli, a senior fixed-income money manager at Allianz Global Investors, which manages about $505 billion.

And it’s not like debt investors are spoiled for choice. Benchmark 10-year notes in every G-7 nation yield less than 2 percent. Even U.S. Treasuries, “the least ugly duck out there,” according to Amundi’s David Ric, now yield 1.74 percent after tumbling by about a half-percentage point this year.

Many investors, especially at the start of the year, were looking for “something liquid and something that has value,” said Ric, the London-based head of absolute-return fixed-income strategies at Amundi, which oversees more than $1 trillion. “So Treasuries looked reasonable from that perspective because they offer a decent yield.”


Still, the traditional yield advantage that U.S. debt has enjoyed over sovereign bonds in Europe and Japan isn’t so clear anymore.

For euro-based buyers of 10-year Treasuries, swapping the dollar interest payments into euros over the life the security lowers the yield to 0.12 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, which uses a cross-currency yield analysis based on future expectations for interest rates and foreign exchange. That’s less than the 0.2 percent yield on German 10-year bunds.

For Japanese buyers, it’s even worse. The same process results in a minus 0.68 percent yield in yen.

The effect is already playing out this month. While Treasuries have returned 1 percent in February, that translates into a loss of 1.6 percent in euros, Bank of America data show. In yen, the loss balloons to 5.9 percent. What’s more, hedging all the currency risk results in a return for euro buyers that’s no better than just investing in German bunds.

Part of the reason the comparative advantage has diminished has to do with the yield-starved investors in Europe and Japan themselves, who poured into U.S. debt over the past year to try and eke out bigger returns.

The worsening U.S. outlook is also driving more investors into the safety of Treasuries. Traders have all but abandoned expectations the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates this year. While Fed officials have said any discussion of negative rates was premature, Chair Janet Yellen noted in Congressional testimony that the central bank was taking another look at negative rates as a potential tool if the economy faltered.

Yet regardless of where debt investors turn for shelter, what’s becoming increasingly clear that they’re going to ever greater lengths for that security.

“We are in a totally new world,” said Allianz’s Vittorangeli.

bloomberg.com