SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (922905)2/24/2016 1:11:18 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575900
 
Illegals will be voting in the 2016 election

By DrJohn 107 Comments Sun, Feb, 15th, 2015 12,680 views

Illegals will be voting in the 2016 election. You can bet on it, and it all began in 1993.

In 1993 Bill Clinton and democrats passed what is known as the Motor Voter law.

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), popularly known as The Motor Voter Act, is a legislation that required state governments to allow registration when a qualifying voter applied for or renewed their drivers license or applied for social services. This legislation forced state governments to make the voter registration process easier by providing uniform registration services through drivers’ license registration centers, disability centers, schools, libraries, and mail-in registration.

And pay attention to this:

The NVRA allows the Department of Justice to bring civil actions in federal court to enforce its requirements. The Act also gives the responsibility to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to provide States with guidance on the Act, to develop a national mail voter registration form, and to compile reports on the effectiveness of the Act.

That’s going to be important later.

Yesterday the Washington Times reports an alleged “loophole” in Obama’s amnesty program will allow illegals to vote:

President Obama’s temporary deportation amnesty will make it easier for illegal immigrants to improperly register and vote in elections, state elections officials testified to Congress on Thursday, saying that the driver’s licenses and Social Security numbers they will be granted create a major voting loophole.

While stressing that it remains illegal for noncitizens to vote, secretaries of state from Ohio and Kansas said they won’t have the tools to sniff out illegal immigrants who register anyway, ignoring stiff penalties to fill out the registration forms that are easily available at shopping malls, motor vehicle bureaus and in curbside registration drives.

Anyone registering to vote attests that he or she is a citizen, but Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted said mass registration drives often aren’t able to give due attention to that part, and so illegal immigrants will still get through.

The Obama sycophants weighed in:

Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia’s nonvoting member of Congress, accused Republicans of an effort at voter suppression.

“The president’s executive order gives immigrants the right to stay — immigrants who have been here for years, immigrants who have been working hard and whose labor we have needed,” Ms. Norton said. “The Republicans may want to go down in history as the party who tried once again 100 years later to nullify the right to vote. Well, I am here to say they shall not succeed.”

And from a Massachusetts democrat:

Rep. Stephen F. Lynch, Massachusetts Democrat, said he doubted illegal immigrants would risk running afoul of the law — which could get them deported — just to be an insignificant part of an election.

5-6 million illegals voting is not insignificant. Only four states require proof of citizenship before someone registers to vote:

And even in those states, the federal government offers voter registration cards that don’t require proof of citizenship, giving determined illegal immigrants a way to circumvent checks.

Lynch’s argument that illegals would not risk running afoul of the law because it might get them deported is as asinine as it is hollow.

Obama not only is not deporting anyone any more, he is releasing illegal alien criminals to the streets of America. Voting fraud is a federal offense but any action on such fraud would require action by the Attorney General. We all know where that will go- absolutely nowhere. There is no deterrent to illegals committing any voter fraud.

This administration has granted illegal aliens more rights and privileges than American citizens have, including being able to collect back tax credits without having to have paid any taxes. Biden says illegals are “already Americans.”

And Americans have a right to vote, don’t they?

http://www.floppingaces.net/2015/02/15/illegals-will-be-voting-in-the-2016-election/comment-page-1/



To: Brumar89 who wrote (922905)2/24/2016 1:15:14 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1575900
 
Bernie Sanders, Lifelong Stalinist

What is the difference between an actual communist — i.e., a Stalinist — and a “democratic socialist”? Not much, if you are talking about Bernie Sanders. Investor’s Business Daily notes that Sanders spent months soaking up communist indoctrination at a hardcore Stalinist camp in Israel, and lists a few other milestones on his personal road toward the Dictatorship of the Proletariat:

1963-64: He joined the Young People’s Socialist League, the youth wing of the Socialist Party USA. Sanders also organized for a communist front, the United Packinghouse Workers Union, which at the time was infiltrated by hardened Communist agents and under investigation by the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

1971-76: Sanders helped found the socialist Liberty Union Party in Vermont, where he ran for governor and senator while calling for the government takeover of the medical industry and “all privately owned electric utilities,” as well as the “nationalization of the oil industry” — “without compensation to the banks and wealthy individuals who own them.”

Sounding like Lenin, he also demanded the government actually seize corporate assets and the wealth of billionaires, namely the Rockefellers, and redistribute it “for all people.”

1977: As founder of the socialist American People’s Historical Society, Sanders produced a 30-minute color documentary exalting his hero, socialist revolutionary Eugene Debs, who was jailed under the Espionage Act. (Today he keeps a portrait of Debs on his Senate office wall.)

1979: Sanders penned a piece for a local leftist rag arguing for the public takeover of the television industry, banishing commercial advertising and putting content under control of the government, a la Pravda.

1981: As Burlington’s new mayor, Sanders announced he didn’t believe in private charities and favored disbanding them, explaining government should be responsible for all social welfare and charity.

1981: Sanders adopted a Soviet sister city outside Moscow, as well as a city in Nicaragua to support the communist Sandinista revolution there.

1985: Sanders invited officials from the Soviet Union and communist China to stop by his office, while proposing that Washington divert military defense funds to “pay for thousands of U.S. children to go to the Soviet Union.”

July 1985: After passing a resolution pledging Burlington would defy President Reagan’s embargo on communist-controlled Nicaragua, Sanders traveled to Managua to attend, along with Soviet officials, an anti-U.S. rally sponsored by the Sandinistas.

He reportedly stood with a crowd that chanted, “Here, there, everywhere, the Yankee will die.” His trip was said to have been paid for by the Sandinista government. Sanders, in turn, invited Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega to visit the U.S.

1985: In a letter to the Sandinistas, according to the New York Post, Sanders pledged his support for their “struggle,” calling it a “heroic revolution” while accusing the Reagan administration of engaging in “terrorist activities.”

1985: In an interview with Vermont government-access TV, Sanders claimed: “The Sandinista government has more support among the Nicaraguan people — substantially more support — than Ronald Reagan has among the American people,” even though Reagan had just been reelected in a historic landslide.

1985: In the same interview, he praised Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, claiming “he educated their kids, gave their kids health care, totally transformed society.” He later showed his affection by traveling to Havana and meeting with its mayor.

1985: In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Sanders proclaimed: “The whole quality of life in America is based on greed. I believe in the redistribution of wealth in this nation.”

1988: One day after wedding his second and current wife, Jane Sanders, the two traveled to the USSR for their honeymoon. Upon returning, Sanders praised communist health care and housing, noting “the cost of both services is much, much higher in the United States.”

1989: With the West on the verge of winning the Cold War, Sanders addressed the national conference of the U.S. Peace Council — another known front for the Communist Party USA, whose members swore an oath to “the triumph of Soviet power in the U.S.”

By now it should be clear what Sanders means when he triumphantly croaks the word “revolution.”

Sanders is much worse than some crazy but well-meaning old coot who looks like he smells bad. He is a communist — an adherent to an ideology that killed over 100 million of its own subjects during the 20th century and subjected the rest to misery and subhuman degradation. Our nuclear arsenal was developed so that we would not have to live under the rule of evil men like Bernie Sanders.

What’s the difference between a communist and a “democratic socialist” like Bernie Sanders? There is only one: what they are able to impose. The longer leftists stay in power, the more they will be able to impose, until there is no difference at all.



- See more at: http://moonbattery.com/?p=69097#sthash.abBzVtTw.dpuf



To: Brumar89 who wrote (922905)2/24/2016 1:18:45 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575900
 
Feds Welcome Immigrants With Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Gives us your tired, your poor, your degenerates festering with sexually transmitted diseases…

The administration has decided to let immigrants with three sexually transmitted diseases known for causing sores or lesions on genitalia to enter the United States, an expansion of a previous decision to let in those with HIV. The Department of Health and Human Services this month opened the borders to those with the STDs…

A report from the Centers for Immigration Studies said that HHS does not believe that the costs to taxpayers to handle the immigrants with STDs will be significant. Those paying the taxes may beg to differ. Now, said the Center, the list of inadmissible communicable diseases only includes syphilis, gonorrhea, tuberculosis, and leprosy. If you have any or all of those, just walk across the virtually undefended Mexican border and wait for amnesty. If it is up to Democrats, you will soon qualify for ObamaCare in the meantime. Obama recently decided that New Democrats with chancroid, granuloma inguinale, and lymphogranuloma venereum are welcome in the USA. These diseases tend to afflict the genital region, but here’s a photo of a lymphogranuloma venereum lesion that is family friendly:

[ Deleted so someone doesn't sic SI Admin on me. ]

There was a time when immigrants were allowed into the United States on the basis of their likelihood of being an asset. Now the objective is to import as many as possible, with a deliberate emphasis on those most likely to be government-dependent and unassimilable. This is because America is getting fundamentally transformed by people who do not mean it well.

- See more at: http://moonbattery.com/#sthash.qS97iOIJ.dpuf



To: Brumar89 who wrote (922905)2/24/2016 5:54:40 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575900
 
White House slashed NYC terror funding to punish Schumer, former top cop says
The WH slashed funding by 60 or 90 million dollars because NYC still has 600 million it has not spent..........



To: Brumar89 who wrote (922905)2/25/2016 7:31:18 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 1575900
 
UFB.....impeach that POS.