SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SteveG who wrote (8598)12/28/1997 9:12:00 AM
From: bill c.  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 21342
 
SteveG: >> I hardly think that characterizes my posts. Let's review our recent exchange:... Further, your labeling of my posts as disinformation, and your other inflammatory accusations, are groundless, incorrect and unwarranted. <<

I CLEARLY remember your trading and negative/positive tones on the AMTX thread. You used your PEG numbers while shorting the stock, then flipped/flopped on your tone once you covered and purchased. Once someone does this, I place a label on them. Right or wrong, this is how I feel about your recent posts.

>> This is completely disingenuous and inconsistent with your opening statement (where you ostensibly agree that - discussions here do not affect stock price and should not be reduced to worthless PR battlezon <<

I think YOU need to re-think the effects of these threads. I would suggest you go back and review your Sept-Oct AMTX posts. I'm having a difficult time getting past your shorting and negative comments on the AMTX thread. You've attempted to provide detailed PEG numbers, that yourself admit, shouldn't be used against Westell. I think you have an agenda... period.

>> In addition to your "adamant" one-sidedness, these errant and unfounded accusations tend to characterize to you as no less a silly PR propagandist (with the consequent presumption of "protecting your space"), than AMTX's Mudge, et al. <<

One-sidedness... were you around when Westell lost the BC contract, or recently when I talked about a production level DSLAM device, or when GTE CLEC announced. Take a GOOD look in the mirror, you haven't ONCE talked about a positive for Westell. You say that you don't care one way or the other, but you ONLY POST on the WESTELL thread recently. If you think PEG numbers are a good thing... go use them on the WCII thread, or ASND threads. Why don't you use them on a stock you own, and get into a detailed discussion on those thread. Your past history on the AMTX has LABELED you as a SHORTER, with an AGENDA. Bragging about your 1 1/2 point gain on your short and purchase of AMTX. I now see the same PEG numbers on the Westell thread....

I've had my fill of SteveG.... best of luck or your short or purchase.