Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PNWC - Pacific Norwest Capital -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: snorkel who wrote (70)	12/28/1997 1:25:00 PM
From: Rob Ady	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 295

Snorkel: You are exactly right. All they have to do to prove the things that have been "leaked" are true is release it in print. I think I am safe in saying we ALL would be happy with that. It is interesting how it is O.K. for the office to tell us these things when you call them but when it is written here by someone then all of a sudden that is a problem. Why? True is true, isn't it? They get mad when we talk about the discrepancies in THEIR own stories and rumors THEY start. It seems they are responsible for THEIR problems not us. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out where all this information we are talking about came from--THEM. If the limestone deal they are talking about was going to happen and the market believed it, the market would run over a few "small potatoes" like ourselves regardless of what we said here. They seem infinitely concerned about maintaining share price on rumor and innuendo--there is only one reason to do that that I am aware of. If there is not "proof"(news releases) of what was said to people then it never happened. What would share price even matter if there was/is going to be a sale of the company like you were told Snorkel? If there is going to be no news till mid January then they ought to tell us that when we call instead of telling me every week for over a month that news was coming that day. How difficult is it to see that undermines their own credibility? Why would we believe what they tell us? For some reason they think we should. Do we need to list all the "facts" that were manufactured and fed to us about Vescan and AFF? We all know NONE of them ever came true. What are they selling for these days? Same source of info. for WNCR, same result so far. I will be interested to see what changes WNCR makes if any to turn this train around. They want credibility, they ought to do something professional to earn it. Rob